liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Uustal Fornell, Eva
Alternativa namn
Publikasjoner (10 av 10) Visa alla publikasjoner
Pihl, S., Uustal Fornell, E. & Blomberg, M. (2019). Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study. International Urogynecology Journal, 30(6), 939-944
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Urogynecology Journal, ISSN 0937-3462, E-ISSN 1433-3023, Vol. 30, nr 6, s. 939-944Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction and Hypothesis

No measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD.

Methods

A prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care.

Results

Women with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20 mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n = 85) was 18.8 mm (95% CI 17.8–19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n = 33) 15.7 mm (95% CI 13.7–17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n = 32) 11.8 mm (95% CI 9.7–13.9) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

A short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20 mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer London, 2019
Emneord
Anovaginal distance; Obstetrical anal sphincter injury; Perineal laceration; Transperineal ultrasound
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-157515 (URN)10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5 (DOI)000467656700011 ()30535980 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85058189785 (Scopus ID)
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Ostergotland Region

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-06-23 Laget: 2019-06-23 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-26bibliografisk kontrollert
Nilsson, A., Grossmann, B., Kullman, E., Uustal, E., Sjöberg, F. & Nilsson, L. (2015). Sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomised controlled study of patient-controlled propofol sedation and that given by a nurse anaesthetist. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 50(10), 1285-1292
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomised controlled study of patient-controlled propofol sedation and that given by a nurse anaesthetist
Vise andre…
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, ISSN 0036-5521, E-ISSN 1502-7708, Vol. 50, nr 10, s. 1285-1292Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Different regimens are used for sedation during ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography). Our objectives were to compare safety, ease of treatment, time to recovery and patients’ experiences using PCS (patient-controlled sedation) with propofol as well as sedation given by a nurse anaesthetist (ACS) with propofol or midazolam during ERCP.

Material and methods: The study included 281 adults in 301 procedures. The PCS group (n=101) delivered bolus doses of 5 mg of propofol according to their need for sedation. The ACS group (n=100) had 2-8 mg/kg/hour of propofol infused, with the target for sedation being Level 3 of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (OAA/S). The control group was given 2-3 mg of midazolam for induction and additional 1 mg if required.

Results: PCS and ACS increased the ease of the procedure and reduced the numbers of sedation failures compared to midazolam sedation (ACS n=0; PCS n=4; midazolam n=20). The ACS group had more deeply sedated patients (OAA/S Level 2), desaturations and obstructed airways than the PCS and midazolam groups. Over 90% of all patients had recovered (Aldrete score≥9) by the time they returned to the ward. PCS resulted in the least fatigue and pain after the procedure. Patients’ preference for PCS and ACS were the same.

Conclusion: PCS with propofol is superior to midazolam and comparable to ACS. PCS resulted in a rapid recovery, tended to be the safest and was almost as effective as ACS in ensuring a successful examination.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2015
Emneord
Conscious sedation, propofol, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-112371 (URN)10.3109/00365521.2015.1038848 (DOI)000361324600013 ()
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-11-24 Laget: 2014-11-24 Sist oppdatert: 2019-05-13bibliografisk kontrollert
Nilsson, A., Nilsson, L., Schnider, T., Uustal, E. & Sjöberg, F. (2015). Should Propofol and Alfentanil Be Combined in Patient-Controlled Sedation? A Randomised Controlled Trial Using Pharmacokinetic Simulation. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 5(6), 122-129
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Should Propofol and Alfentanil Be Combined in Patient-Controlled Sedation? A Randomised Controlled Trial Using Pharmacokinetic Simulation
Vise andre…
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Open Journal of Anesthesiology, ISSN 2164-5558, Vol. 5, nr 6, s. 122-129Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is increasingly used for moderate sedation. Detailed understanding is essential for maintaining safety and giving the most benefit. We wanted to explore the associations between patients’ characteristics, perioperative pain and anxiety, the procedure, and the calculated concentrations at the effect site (Ce) of propofol. We also wanted to analyse the pharmacokinetic profiles of propofol and alfentanil during PCS, and their association with respiratory complications.

Methods: 155 patients were double-blinded and randomised to have propofol or propofol and alfentanil for PCS during gynaecological surgery. Pharmacokinetic simulation of Ce and multiple regressions aided the search for correlations between explanatory variables and concentrations of drugs.

Results: In group propofol, treatment for incontinence, anterior repair, and the patient’s weight correlated the best (B-coef = 0.20, 0.20 and 0.01; r = 0.69; r² = 0.48). When alfentanil was added, alfentanil and the patient’s weight were associated with Ce of propofol (B-coef = -0.40 and 0.01; r = 0.70; r² = 0.43). Logistic regression indicated that age and Ce of drugs were related to ten cases of respiratory complications.

Conclusions: Patients’ weights and the type of surgery performed were associated with the Ce of propofol; this knowledge could be used for refinement of the doses given during PCS. Because the pharmacokinetic profiles of propofol and alfentanil are different, the alfentanil effect becomes predominant during the time course of sedation. In order to reduce the risk of early and late respiratory depression, alfentanil should not be added to propofol in the same syringe.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Scientific Research Publishing, 2015
Emneord
Anaesthetics, Intravenous, Propofol, Analgesics, Opioids, Alfentanil, Sedation
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126606 (URN)10.4236/ojanes.2015.56023 (DOI)
Merknad

At the time for thesis presentation publication was in status: Manuscript

Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-03-31 Laget: 2016-03-31 Sist oppdatert: 2016-12-16bibliografisk kontrollert
Nilsson, A., Nilsson, L., Uustal, E. & Sjöberg, F. (2012). Alfentanil and patient-controlled propofol sedation – facilitate gynaecological outpatient surgery with increased risk of respiratory events. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 56(9), 1123-1129
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Alfentanil and patient-controlled propofol sedation – facilitate gynaecological outpatient surgery with increased risk of respiratory events
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 56, nr 9, s. 1123-1129Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Widespread use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) demands simplicity and a predictable outcome. We evaluated patients’ safety and ease of use of PCS for gynaecological outpatient procedures.

Methods

In a prospective double-blind study, 165 patients were randomized to use propofol or propofol with alfentanil as PCS combined with local anaesthetic for pain control. Data on cardiopulmonary function, consciousness, and need for interventions were collected at baseline and every fifth minute. The surgeons’ evaluation of the ease and the duration of the procedure were recorded.

Results

One hundred and fifty-five patients used PCS for the entire procedure, 76 patients propofol, and 79 patients propofol/alfentanil. Fifteen procedures in the propofol group were limited or could not be done, compared with four in the propofol/alfentanil group (P = 0.02). The duration of surgery was not affected. The addition of alfentanil affected respiratory function compared with the propofol group: five patients compared with none were manually ventilated (P = 0.03), and two thirds, compared with a quarter, were given supplementary oxygen as their saturation decreased below 90% (P <0.001). Overall cardiovascular stability was maintained. The propofol group had deeper conscious sedation as measured by the bispectral index (P  = 0.03), but all patients could be roused. In the propofol/alfentanil group, five patients became apnoeic and could not be roused.

Conclusions

PCS using propofol alone supports patients’ safety, as the addition of alfentanil increased the need for specific interventions to maintain respiratory stability. However, alfentanil increases the feasibility of the procedure, as complementary doses of propofol were not required.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Wiley-Blackwell, 2012
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-84741 (URN)10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02749.x (DOI)000308635200007 ()
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Linkoping University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden|581 85|

Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-10-19 Laget: 2012-10-19 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07
Uustal Fornell, E. (2012). Functional ultrasound of the anal canal: the effect of pregnancy and childbirth in ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, vol 91, issue SI, pp 20-21. In: ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (pp. 20-21). Informa Healthcare / Wiley-Blackwell, 91(SI)
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Functional ultrasound of the anal canal: the effect of pregnancy and childbirth in ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, vol 91, issue SI, pp 20-21
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Informa Healthcare / Wiley-Blackwell , 2012, Vol. 91, nr SI, s. 20-21Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

n/a

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Informa Healthcare / Wiley-Blackwell, 2012
Serie
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, ISSN 0001-6349
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79103 (URN)000304987600020 ()
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-06-29 Laget: 2012-06-29 Sist oppdatert: 2012-06-29
Uustal Fornell, E., Matthiesen, L., Sjödahl, R. & Berg, G. (2005). Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 112(3), 312-316
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects
2005 (engelsk)Inngår i: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN 1470-0328, E-ISSN 1471-0528, Vol. 112, nr 3, s. 312-316Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective  To establish the long term effects of obstetric anal sphincter rupture.

Design  Prospective observational study.

Setting  University hospital in Sweden.

Population  Eighty-two women from a prospective study from 1990 to compare anorectal function after third degree tear.

Methods  Women completed a structured questionnaire, underwent a clinical examination and anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound (EAUSG) with perineal body measurement.

Main outcome measures  Symptoms of anal incontinence, sexual symptoms, anal manometry scores and evidence of sphincter damage on EAUSG.

Results  Five women had undergone secondary repair and three were lost to follow up. Fifty-one women (80%) completed the questionnaire. Twenty-six out of 46 (57%) of the original study group and 6/28 (20%) of the original controls were examined. Incontinence to flatus and liquid stool was more severe in the study group than in controls. Flatus incontinence was significantly more pronounced among women with subsequent vaginal deliveries. Mean maximal anal squeeze pressures were 69 mmHg in the partial rupture group and 42 mmHg in the complete rupture group (P= 0.04). Study group women with signs of internal sphincter injury reported more pronounced faecal incontinence and had lower anal resting pressures (24 mmHg) than those with intact internal sphincters (40 mmHg) (P= 0.01). Perineal body thickness of less than 10 mm was associated with incontinence for flatus and liquid stools, less lubrication during sex and lower anal squeeze pressures (58 mmHg vs 89 mmHg, P= 0.04).

Conclusions  Subjective and objective anal function after anal sphincter injury deteriorates further over time and with subsequent vaginal deliveries. Thin perineal body and internal sphincter injury seem to be important for continence and anal pressure.

HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-24618 (URN)10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00400.x (DOI)6797 (Lokal ID)6797 (Arkivnummer)6797 (OAI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-07 Laget: 2009-10-07 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-13bibliografisk kontrollert
Uustal Fornell, E., Wingren, G. & Kjølhede, P. (2004). Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83(4), 383-389
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study
2004 (engelsk)Inngår i: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 83, nr 4, s. 383-389Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective.  To describe a general population of women with regard to factors associated with urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse symptoms.

Methods.  A questionnaire about medical background, urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse symptoms was mailed to 1000 40-year-old and 1000 60-year-old Swedish women. Associations were described by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results.  Sixty-seven percent answered the questionnaire. Multivariate analysis showed urinary incontinence to be associated with anal sphincter rupture [OR 4.4 (95%  CI 1.0–18.8)], pelvic heaviness [3.8 (2.1–7.0)], body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2[3.7 (2.0–6.7)], multiparity [1.8 (1.0–3.4)], varicose veins surgery [1.9 (1.2–3.2)] and age [1.9 (1.2–3.2)]. Univariate analyses revealed statistically significant associations between urinary incontinence and incontinence for flatus [4.8 (3.0–7.8)], for liquid stool [5.0 (2.9–8.6)] and for solid stool [5.9 (2.4–14.2)]. Chronic bronchitis [5.7 (1.7–18.9)] was strongly associated with urinary incontinence but was only reported by the older age group. Prolapse symptoms were strongly associated with both urinary and fecal incontinence. Prolapse symptoms as opposed to urinary and fecal incontinence seemed to be associated more with injuries at delivery than with chronic pelvic floor strain.

Conclusions.  Women with urinary incontinence are also likely to suffer from fecal incontinence and prolapse and vice versa. Other associated factors for pelvic floor dysfunction were overweight, and especially obesity, chronic bronchitis, vaginal delivery and multiparity, age, heredity and diseases suggestive of collagen disorders. A multidisciplinary management of women with pelvic floor symptoms is suggested and possible prevention is discussed.

HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-22262 (URN)10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00367.x (DOI)1435 (Lokal ID)1435 (Arkivnummer)1435 (OAI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-07 Laget: 2009-10-07 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-28bibliografisk kontrollert
Uustal Fornell, E. (2003). Pelvic floor dysfunction: a clinical and epidemiological study. (Doctoral dissertation). Linköping: Linköpings universitet
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Pelvic floor dysfunction: a clinical and epidemiological study
2003 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

In a prospective study established in 1990, anal sphincter rupture at delivery was found in 2.4% of women and 47% of these women had problems with fecal incontinence. Although less severe, fecal incontinence was also found among 45% in a comparison group without anal sphincter rupture. In a follow-up study after ten years, no improvement was noted in either group. Women with anal sphincter rupture were more subjectively incontinent and had lower anal pressures than the comparison group. Women with subsequent vaginal deliveries had lower anal pressures and more incontinence than those delivered by caesarean section or no subsequent delivery.

In an epidemiological study of 1368 women, urinary incontinence was found in 9% of 40-year-olds and 19% of 60-year-olds. Flatus incontinence was found in 9% and 19%, incontinence for liquid stool in 5% and 8% and for solid stool 0.3% and 1. 7% in 40-year-olds and 60-year-olds, respectively. Genital prolapse symptoms were found in 4% (genital bulge), 15% (pelvic heaviness) and use of finger in vagina or perineum by defecation (12%) in all women.

Factors associated with urinary and fecal incontinence were anal sphincter rupture, chronic bronchitis, overweight, multiparity, age, hiatus and groin hernias and hysterectomy. Prolapse symptoms were associated with vaginal delivery and large tears at delivery but not with overweight. All types of incontinence and genital prolapse were strongly associated with each other.

For epidemiological studies, the definition of urinary incontinence as leakage weekly or more often is suggested. The concept of flatus incontinence needs careful operationalization to be of value in differentiating symptoms of anal sphincter dysfunction from disorders of bowel motility and normal passing of wind. A model for operationalization is proposed. Possible measures for the prevention of PFD could be prevention of chronic bronchitis, overweight and large injuries at delivery, especially after large tears and anal sphincter rupture.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2003. s. 78
Serie
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 822
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26675 (URN)11242 (Lokal ID)91-7373-511-6 (ISBN)11242 (Arkivnummer)11242 (OAI)
Disputas
2003-11-14, Victoriasalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 09:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-08 Laget: 2009-10-08 Sist oppdatert: 2012-10-16bibliografisk kontrollert
Uustal Fornell, E., Wingren, G. & Kjölhede, P. (2003). Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 82(3), 280-286
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women
2003 (engelsk)Inngår i: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 82, nr 3, s. 280-286Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. Urinary incontinence is common in women. How often incontinence occurs has been only briefly investigated. Studies on the prevalence of fecal incontinence are few. The epidemiology of genital prolapse symptoms is unknown. This epidemiological study describes a general population of women aged 40 and 60 years with regard to the prevalence and frequency of urinary and fecal incontinence and the prevalence of genital prolapse symptoms.

Methods. A questionnaire on medical background, urinary and fecal incontinence, and genital prolapse symptoms was sent to 1000 40-year-old and 1000 60-year-old randomly selected women.

Results. Sixty-seven per cent answered: 53% were continent for urine; 9% of the 40-year-olds and 19% of the 60-year-olds had urinary incontinence weekly or more often. Detrusor instability score was significantly higher in the 60-year-olds. Incontinence of flatus, weekly or more often, was reported by 9% and 19%, loose feces by 5% and 8%, and solid feces by 0.3% and 1.7% according to the 40- and 60-year-olds, respectively. Fifty-three per cent reported no flatus incontinence. Of the prolapse symptoms investigated, 15% of the females reported pelvic heaviness, 4% genital bulge, and 12% use of fingers in the vagina or perineum by defecation.

Conclusions. Incontinence of urine is common in this population. Flatus incontinence is as common, but the concept must be operationalized if used as an endpoint in research. The International Continence Society's (ICS) definition of urinary incontinence is unpractical for use in epidemiological research. We suggest leakage weekly or more often as a criterion for significant incontinence in epidemiological research.

HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26510 (URN)10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00103.x (DOI)11067 (Lokal ID)11067 (Arkivnummer)11067 (OAI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-08 Laget: 2009-10-08 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-28bibliografisk kontrollert
Fornell, E. (2003). Urininkontinens vanligt hos nunnor. Läkartidningen, 99, 2282-2282
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Urininkontinens vanligt hos nunnor
2003 (svensk)Inngår i: Läkartidningen, ISSN 0023-7205, E-ISSN 1652-7518, Vol. 99, s. 2282-2282Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet vitenskapelig) Published
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26617 (URN)11182 (Lokal ID)11182 (Arkivnummer)11182 (OAI)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-08 Laget: 2009-10-08 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-13
Organisasjoner