liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Gunnarsson, Svante
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 197) Show all publications
Fahlgren, A., Larsson, M., Lindahl, M., Thorsell, A., Kågedal, K. & Gunnarsson, S. (2019). Design and Outcome of a CDIO Syllabus Survey for a Biomedicine Program. In: Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer (Ed.), The 15th International CDIO Conference: Proceedings – Full Papers: . Paper presented at The 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25–27, 2019 (pp. 191-200). Aarhus: Aarhus University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Design and Outcome of a CDIO Syllabus Survey for a Biomedicine Program
Show others...
2019 (English)In: The 15th International CDIO Conference: Proceedings – Full Papers / [ed] Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer, Aarhus: Aarhus University , 2019, p. 191-200Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The CDIO Syllabus survey has successfully been applied to the Bachelor’s and Master’s programs in Experimental and Medical Biosciences, within the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Linköping University, Sweden. The programs are and have been, subject to considerable redesign with strong influence from the CDIO framework. One of the main drivers for the redesign is a shift concerning the main job market after graduation, from an academic career to industry and healthcare. One of the steps in the development process has been to carry out a Syllabus survey based on an adapted version of the CDIO Syllabus. The survey was sent out to students and to various categories of professionals, and in total 87 responses were received. The adapted version of the Syllabus and the design, execution, and outcome of the survey is presented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Aarhus: Aarhus University, 2019
Series
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, ISSN 2002-1593 ; 2019
Keywords
CDIO Syllabus, curriculum design, stakeholders, Standards: 1, 2, 3, 12.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161046 (URN)9788775074594 (ISBN)
Conference
The 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25–27, 2019
Available from: 2019-10-18 Created: 2019-10-18 Last updated: 2019-10-21Bibliographically approved
Malmqvist, J., Knutsson Wedel, M., Lundquist, U., Edström, K., Roesén, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., . . . Kamp, A. (2019). Towards CDIO Standards 3.0. In: Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer (Ed.), The 15th International CDIO Conference Proceedings – Full Papers: . Paper presented at 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25 – 27, 2019 (pp. 44-66).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Towards CDIO Standards 3.0
Show others...
2019 (English)In: The 15th International CDIO Conference Proceedings – Full Papers / [ed] Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer, 2019, p. 44-66Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The topic of this paper is the CDIO Standards, specifically the formulation of CDIO Standards version 3.0. The paper first reviews the potential change drivers that motivate a revision of the Standards. Such change drivers are identified both externally (i.e., from outside of the CDIO community) and internally. It is found that external change drivers have affected the perceptions of what problems engineers should address, what knowledge future engineers should possess and what are the most effective teaching practices in engineering education. Internally, the paper identifies criticism of the Standards, as well as ideas for development, that have been codified as proposed additional CDIO Standards. With references to these change drivers, five areas are identified for the revision: sustainability, digitalization of teaching and learning; service; and faculty competence. A revised version of the Standards is presented. In addition, it is proposed that a new category of Standards is established, “optional standards”. Optional Standards are a complement to the twelve “basic” Standards, and serve to guide educational development and profiling beyond the current Standards. A selected set of proposed optional Standards are recommended for further evaluation and possibly acceptance by the CDIO community

Series
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, ISSN 2002-1593
Keywords
Sustainable development, Digitalization, Learning environments, Faculty competence, Standards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161035 (URN)10.7146/aul.347 (DOI)9788775074594 (ISBN)
Conference
15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25 – 27, 2019
Available from: 2019-10-17 Created: 2019-10-17 Last updated: 2019-10-25Bibliographically approved
Gunnarsson, S., Herbertsson, H. & Petersson, H. (2019). Using Course and Program Matrices as Components in a Quality Assurance System. In: Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer (Ed.), The 15th International CDIO Conference: Proceedings – Full Papers: . Paper presented at The 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25–27, 2019 (pp. 110-119). Aarhus: Aarhus University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Using Course and Program Matrices as Components in a Quality Assurance System
2019 (English)In: The 15th International CDIO Conference: Proceedings – Full Papers / [ed] Jens Bennedsen, Aage Birkkjær Lauritsen, Kristina Edström, Natha Kuptasthien, Janne Roslöf & Robert Songer, Aarhus: Aarhus University , 2019, p. 110-119Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The CDIO framework is an integrated and important part of the new quality assurance system within the Faculty of Science and Engineering at Linköping University. Both the CDIO Syllabus and the CDIO Standards are used extensively in the system. First, the paper presents the development and use of the second generation of course matrices (previously denoted ITU-matrices) and program matrices, which build upon an adapted and extended version of the CDIO Syllabus. The extension is made to also include bachelor’s and master’s program in subjects outside the engineering field. Second, the paper presents how the CDIO Standards are used in the quality reports, which are vital parts of the quality assurance systems. As a result, the CDIO framework is used for the design, management, and quality assurance of all education programs ( approximately 60 programs) within the Faculty of Science and Engineering at Linköping University.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Aarhus: Aarhus University, 2019
Series
Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, ISSN 2002-1593 ; 2019
Keywords
Quality assurance, CDIO Syllabus, CDIO Standards, course matrix, program matrix, Standards: 1-8, 11
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161031 (URN)9788775074594 (ISBN)
Conference
The 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25–27, 2019
Available from: 2019-10-17 Created: 2019-10-17 Last updated: 2019-10-21Bibliographically approved
Johansson, V., Moberg, S., Hedberg, E., Norrlöf, M. & Gunnarsson, S. (2018). A learning approach for feed-forward friction compensation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control: . Paper presented at 12th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, Budapest, Hungary, August 27-30, 2018 (pp. 412-417). , 51, Article ID 22.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A learning approach for feed-forward friction compensation
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Proceedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, 2018, Vol. 51, p. 412-417, article id 22Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

An experimental comparison of two feed-forward based frictioncompensation methods is presented. The first method is based on theLuGre friction model, using identified friction model parameters, andthe second method is based on B-spline network, where the networkweights are learned from experiments. The methods are evaluated andcompared via experiments using a six axis industrial robot carryingout circular movements of different radii. The experiments show thatthe learning-based friction compensation gives an error reduction ofthe same magnitude as for the LuGre-based friction compensation.

Series
IFAC-PapersOnLine, ISSN 2405-8963
Keywords
friction, feed-forward compensation, splines, learning control, industrial ropots
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-150952 (URN)10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.578 (DOI)
Conference
12th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control, Budapest, Hungary, August 27-30, 2018
Projects
LINK-SIC
Funder
Vinnova
Available from: 2018-09-06 Created: 2018-09-06 Last updated: 2019-10-21
Hedberg, E., Norrlöf, M., Moberg, S. & Gunnarsson, S. (2018). Comparing Feedback Linearization and Jacobian Linearization for LQ Control of an Industrial Manipulator. In: Proccedings of the 12TH IFAC SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT CONTROL: . Paper presented at 12TH IFAC SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT CONTROL.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Comparing Feedback Linearization and Jacobian Linearization for LQ Control of an Industrial Manipulator
2018 (English)In: Proccedings of the 12TH IFAC SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT CONTROL, 2018Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Feedback linearization is compared to Jacobian linearization for LQ control of atwo-link industrial manipulator. A method for obtaining equivalent nominal performance forboth control designs is introduced. An experimentally verified benchmark model with industrialrelevance is used for comparing the designs. Results do not show any conclusive advantages ofFeedback linearization.

National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-151588 (URN)
Conference
12TH IFAC SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT CONTROL
Available from: 2018-09-25 Created: 2018-09-25 Last updated: 2018-10-19
Azevedo Costa, M., Wullt, B., Norrlöf, M. & Gunnarsson, S. (2018). Failure detection in robotic arms using  statistical modeling, machine learning and hybrid gradient boosting. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Failure detection in robotic arms using  statistical modeling, machine learning and hybrid gradient boosting
2018 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Modeling and failure prediction is an important task in manyengineering systems. For this task, the machine learning literaturepresents a large variety of models such as classification trees,random forest, artificial neural networks, fuzzy systems, amongothers. In addition, standard statistical models can be applied suchas the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, $k$-nearestneighbors, among others. This work evaluates advantages andlimitations of statistical and machine learning methods to predictfailures in industrial robots. The work is based on data from morethan five thousand robots in industrial use. Furthermore, a newapproach combining standard statistical and machine learning models,named \emph{hybrid gradient boosting}, is proposed. Results show thatthe a priori treatment of the database, i.e., outlier analysis,consistent database analysis and anomaly analysis have shown to becrucial to improve classification performance for statistical, machinelearning and hybrid models. Furthermore, local joint information hasbeen identified as the main driver for failure detection whereasfailure classification can be improved using additional informationfrom different joints and hybrid models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2018. p. 33
Series
LiTH-ISY-R, ISSN 1400-3902 ; 3107
Keywords
Failure detection in robotic arms using statistical modeling, machine learning and hybrid gradient boosting
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-152437 (URN)LiTH-ISY-R-3107 (ISRN)
Projects
LINK-SIC
Funder
VINNOVA, 2016-05152
Available from: 2018-10-31 Created: 2018-10-31 Last updated: 2018-10-31Bibliographically approved
Gunnarsson, S. (2017). Automatic Control Education in a CDIO Perspective. In: 20th IFAC World Congress: . Paper presented at 20th World Congress of the International-Federation-of-Automatic-Control (IFAC), Toulouse, France, 9–14 July 2017 (pp. 12161-12166). Elsevier, 50(1)(1)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Automatic Control Education in a CDIO Perspective
2017 (English)In: 20th IFAC World Congress, Elsevier, 2017, Vol. 50(1), no 1, p. 12161-12166Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The CDIO framework for development of engineering education is presented, including the overall ideas, the fundamental documents, and some development tools. The automatic control subject and its role in engineering education is studied using the CDIO Standards as reference. Some examples from the engineering education at Linkoping University are presented with special focus on the control education. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017
Series
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, ISSN 2405-8963 ; 50(1)
Keywords
The CDIO framework; the CDIO Standards; active learning; design-implement experiences
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-145494 (URN)10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2145 (DOI)000423965200028 ()
Conference
20th World Congress of the International-Federation-of-Automatic-Control (IFAC), Toulouse, France, 9–14 July 2017
Available from: 2018-03-02 Created: 2018-03-02 Last updated: 2018-06-04Bibliographically approved
Cerqueira, J., Rezende, A., Waldemar, B. M. & Gunnarsson, S. (2016). Introducing CDIO at The Military Institue of Engineering in Brazil. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Introducing CDIO at The Military Institue of Engineering in Brazil
2016 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This report describes the motivation, the current state and the future actions of an improvement process in engineering education at the Brazilian higher education institution called the Military Institute of Engineering. Based on the reasons for why and how to change, the CDIO framework was chosen, at the end of 2014, as the kernel of this improvement process. The activities realized, the plan for the future actions and the open questions are presented in this report.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2016. p. 29
Series
LiTH-ISY-R, ISSN 1400-3902 ; 3088
Keywords
CDIO, CDIO Syllabus, CDIO Standards, Implementation
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-125383 (URN)LiTH-ISY-R-3088 (ISRN)
Available from: 2016-02-22 Created: 2016-02-22 Last updated: 2016-02-23Bibliographically approved
Cerqueira, J., Rezende, A., Barrosso Magno, W. & Gunnarsson, S. (2016). Introduction of the CDIO Framework ay the Military Institue of Engineering in Brazil. In: Jerker Björkqvist, Kristina Edström, Ronald J. Hugo, Juha Kontio, Janne Roslöf, Rick Sellens & Seppo Virtanen (Ed.), The 12th International CDIO Conference Proceedings – Full papers: . Paper presented at 12th International CDIO Conference, June 12-16, Turku, Finland.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Introduction of the CDIO Framework ay the Military Institue of Engineering in Brazil
2016 (English)In: The 12th International CDIO Conference Proceedings – Full papers / [ed] Jerker Björkqvist, Kristina Edström, Ronald J. Hugo, Juha Kontio, Janne Roslöf, Rick Sellens & Seppo Virtanen, 2016Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper describes the motivation, the current state and the further actions of an improvement process of the engineering education at the Military Institute of Engineering (IME) in Brazil. Based on the reasons for why and how to change, the CDIO framework has been chosen as the kernel of this improvement process. The activities realized the plan of the further actions and the open questions are presented in this paper. The paper is a condensed presentation of the report (Cerqueira et. al., 2016), where a thorough background and more details can be found.

Series
Turku University of Applied Sciences, ISSN 1796-9964 ; 45
Keywords
CDIO Initiative, Implementation, CDIO Syllabus, CDIO Standards: 1 - 12
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-129548 (URN)978-952-216-610-4 (ISBN)
Conference
12th International CDIO Conference, June 12-16, Turku, Finland
Note

CDIO Initiative: Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference, ISSN 2002-1593

Available from: 2016-06-21 Created: 2016-06-21 Last updated: 2016-06-30Bibliographically approved
Gunnarsson, S., Jung, Y., Veibäck, C. & Glad, T. (2016). IO (Implement and Operate) First in an Automatic Control Context. In: Jerker Björkqvist, Kristina Edström, Ronald J. Hugo, Juha Kontio, Janne Roslöf, Rick Sellens & Seppo Virtanen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences,Turku, Finland, June 12-16, 2016: . Paper presented at The 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences,Turku, Finland, June 12-16, 2016 (pp. 238-249). CDIO
Open this publication in new window or tab >>IO (Implement and Operate) First in an Automatic Control Context
2016 (English)In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences,Turku, Finland, June 12-16, 2016 / [ed] Jerker Björkqvist, Kristina Edström, Ronald J. Hugo, Juha Kontio, Janne Roslöf, Rick Sellens & Seppo Virtanen, CDIO , 2016, p. 238-249Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A first course in Automatic control is presented.  A main objective of the course is to put most of the emphasis on the Implement and Operate phases in the process of developing a control system for a process. The course is built around a large amount of student active learning based on three extensive laboratory exercises, where each laboratory exercise can have duration of up to two weeks. For each of the laboratory exercises there is a sequence of learning activities supporting the students’ learning: Introductory lecture, problem solving session, preparation work, help-desk session, independent work in the laboratory, and a final demonstration of the control system. In addition there is a small project where the task is to write a manual for a process operator. The laboratory tasks involve implementation of a control system in an industrial PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) and development of an operator interface.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
CDIO, 2016
Series
Research Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences, ISSN 1796-9964 ; 45
Keywords
Active learning, laboratory exercise, PLC-programming, operator interface, Standards 7, 8, 11
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-129383 (URN)978-952-216-610-4 (ISBN)
Conference
The 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences,Turku, Finland, June 12-16, 2016
Available from: 2016-06-21 Created: 2016-06-17 Last updated: 2016-06-30Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications