Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2015 (English)In: Journal of Process Control, ISSN 0959-1524, E-ISSN 1873-2771, Vol. 30, p. 69-79Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
An established method for grey-box identification is to use maximum-likelihood estimation for the nonlinear case implemented via extended Kalman filtering. In applications of (nonlinear) model predictive control a more and more common approach for the state estimation is to use moving horizon estimation, which employs (nonlinear) optimization directly on a model for a whole batch of data. This paper shows that, in the linear case, horizon estimation may also be used for joint parameter estimation and state estimation, as long as a bias correction based on the Kalman filter is included. For the nonlinear case two special cases are presented where the bias correction can be determined without approximation. A procedure how to approximate the bias correction for general nonlinear systems is also outlined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2015
Keywords
System identification; State estimation; Parameter estimation; Optimization; Nonlinear systems; Kalman filtering; Moving horizon estimation; Model predictive control
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-120061 (URN)10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.12.008 (DOI)000356196200007 ()
Note
Funding Agencies|Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) - as part of the Process Industry Centre Linkoping (PIC-LI); Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) through the ITEA 2 project MODRIO; Linnaeus Center CADICS - Swedish Research Council; ERC advanced grant LEARN - European Research Council [similar to267381]
2015-07-062015-07-062024-01-08