liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Nestorson, Jens
Publications (4 of 4) Show all publications
Nestorson, J., Rahme, H. & Adolfsson, L. (2019). Arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and adverse events: a registry-based study. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 28(4), E104-E110
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and adverse events: a registry-based study
2019 (English)In: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, ISSN 1058-2746, E-ISSN 1532-6500, Vol. 28, no 4, p. E104-E110Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Primary prosthetic replacement has become an accepted method for the treatment of complex distal humeral fractures. The present study investigated implant survival and adverse events related to this procedure based on available Swedish registries and examined the completeness of the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty register.

Materials and methods

Patients treated in Sweden with a primary elbow replacement due to a distal humeral fracture between 1999 and 2014 were identified through 3 different registries: The Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register, National Board of Health and Welfare inpatient register, and local registries of all orthopedic departments. Prosthetic survival was examined using Cox regression analysis with Kaplan-Meier plots. Adverse events, defined as medical treatment of the affected elbow besides revision, were analyzed separately. The study included 406 elbows in 405 patients, and no register was complete.

Results

Implant survival at 10 years was 90% (95% confidence interval, 85%-96%), but only 45 patients had an observation time of 10 years or more because 46% of the patients had died, resulting in a mean observation time of 67 (standard deviation, 47) months. An increase in the use of hemiarthroplasties and a proportional decrease of total elbow arthroplasties was detected. There were 18 revisions (4%), and 26 patients (6%) experienced an adverse event, of whom 16 (4%) required surgery. The completeness of the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register regarding primary arthroplasty was 81%.

Conclusion

Primary arthroplasty as treatment of distal humeral fractures produces reliable results with regards to revisions and other adverse events.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Philadelphia, PA, United States: Mosby, Inc., 2019
Keywords
Elbow; fracture; distal humerus; arthroplasty; survival; register
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-155917 (URN)10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.035 (DOI)000461354500002 ()30342824 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85054832097 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-04-02 Created: 2019-04-02 Last updated: 2019-04-10Bibliographically approved
Nestorson, J. (2018). Arthroplasty in Elbow Fracture Treatment. (Doctoral dissertation). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Arthroplasty in Elbow Fracture Treatment
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Open reduction and internal fixation is the treatment of choice for distal humeral fractures. Stable fixation is required to allow early mobilisation and to reduce the risk of poor functional results. In an elderly patient with osteoporotic bone and with a comminuted intra-articular fracture stable internal fixation can be difficult to achieve. In these cases elbow arthroplasty is an option.

An irreparable radial head fracture can be treated by excision or replacement. The indications for the respective procedure are unclear since reports include an array of different associated soft-tissue and bony injuries.

The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the use, complication rates and functional outcome of elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for complex distal humeral fractures and assess the usefulness of radial head replacement in Mason IV fracture dislocations.

50 patients, aged 56-89 years were treated for a distal humeral fracture with primary hemi-arthroplasty using the Kudo© humeral component or the Latitude® prosthesis. The functional outcome was assessed retrospectively. The majority of the 50 patients treated with a primary hemi-arthroplasty for a distal humeral fracture had a good or excellent functional result and regained a functional arc of movement of at least 100 degrees at medium term follow-up. There were six patients suffering secondary surgery and two with persistent ulnar nerve symptoms. Wear of the olecranon fossa was seen, mainly in the eight patients treated with a non-anatomical implant (Kudo®). Functional results were comparable to total elbow arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal humeral fractures. The use of implants that are more anatomical seemed to reduce the degree of olecranon wear but long-term results are lacking.

The nationwide use of primary arthroplasty for a distal humeral fracture between 1999 and 2014 was examined using three different registers. The survival rates in relation to prosthetic desing, age and sex were investigated using Cox regression analysis and number of adverse events recorded.

In total 405 patients were treated with primary arthroplasty for a distal humeral fracture. The mean age at surgery was 75 years and the mean observation time was 67 months. Eighteen patients had undergone revision surgery and another 26 patients suffered an adverse event, 24 of which required secondary surgery.

Increasing age reduced the risk for revision and there was no significant difference in survival between total- and hemi arthroplasty. The cumulative survival rate at 5 years was 99% (CI 98-100) and at 10 years 90% (CI 85-96). Elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures produced reliable results with regards to revision surgery and adverse events.

18 patients, age 19-79 years, treated with radial head replacement, and 14 patients, age 29-70 years, treated with radial head resection, for a Mason IV fracture dislocation were retrospectively reviewed.

There were no significant differences in functional outcome in patients treated with replacement or excision for a Mason IV fracture dislocation. The rate of secondary surgery was higher in patients treated with replacement and ulno-humeral osteoarthritis was more pronounced in patients treated with radial head excision but follow-up was longer in these patients. Functional results were not improved by using radial head arthroplasty for Mason IV fracture dislocation. Secondary osteoarthritis is a concern in patients treated with excision but did not affect functional outcome after a mean follow-up time of 108 months.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2018. p. 122
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1610
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-145284 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-145284 (DOI)9789176853573 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-03-23, Berzeliussalen, Ingång 64, plan 9, Campus US, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2018-02-20 Created: 2018-02-20 Last updated: 2018-02-20Bibliographically approved
Svernlöv, B., Nestorson, J. & Adolfsson, L. (2017). Subjective ulnar nerve dysfunction commonly following open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humeral fractures and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve. Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction (Online), 12(1), 19-25
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Subjective ulnar nerve dysfunction commonly following open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humeral fractures and in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve
2017 (English)In: Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction (Online), ISSN 1828-8928, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 19-25Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the frequency of persistent ulnar affection in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humeral fractures without ulnar nerve transposition or mobilisation. Eighty-two patients (53 women), mean age 62 years, were, at a mean of 48 months, reviewed through medical records and a subjective evaluation form concerning ulnar nerve problems. Ulnar nerve affliction, in most cases regarded as mild, was experienced by 22 patients (27%; 14 women) and significantly associated with multiple surgeries. Three patients had been operated with late neurolysis and one with transposition without reported improvement. The proportion of ulnar nerve dysfunction was equally common regardless of medial or lateral plating. ORIF with plate fixation and without ulnar nerve transposition seems to be an acceptable option for patients with distal humeral fractures. The frequency of ulnar nerve affection in our series does not appear higher than previously reported. Subjective ulnar nerve symptoms were, however, relatively common and appear related to the trauma itself, the surgery, or the post-operative management which highlights the need for further analysis of these factors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2017
Keywords
Dellon; Fracture; Humeral; McGowan; ORIF; Transposition
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-146069 (URN)10.1007/s11751-016-0271-5 (DOI)27909969 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2018-03-27 Created: 2018-03-27 Last updated: 2018-04-27
Nestorson, J., Ekholm, C., Etzner, M. & Adolfsson, L. (2015). Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal humeral fractures: Medium-term follow-up of 42 patients. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97B(10), 1377-1384
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal humeral fractures: Medium-term follow-up of 42 patients
2015 (English)In: The Bone & Joint Journal, ISSN 2049-4394, E-ISSN 2049-4408, Vol. 97B, no 10, p. 1377-1384Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We report our experience of performing an elbow hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of comminuted distal humeral fractures in the elderly patients. A cohort of 42 patients (three men and 39 women, mean age 72; 56 to 84) were reviewed at a mean of 34.3 months (24 to 61) after surgery. Functional outcome was measured with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of movement. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) was used as a patient rated evaluation. Complications and ulnar nerve function were recorded. Plain radiographs were obtained to assess prosthetic loosening, olecranon wear and heterotopic bone formation. The mean extension deficit was 23.5 degrees (0 degrees to 60 degrees) and mean flexion was 126.8 degrees (90 degrees to 145 degrees) giving a mean arc of 105.5 degrees (60 degrees to 145 degrees). The mean MEPS was 90 (50 to 100) and a mean DASH score of 20 (0 to 63). Four patients had additional surgery for limited range of movement and one for partial instability. One elbow was revised due to loosening, two patients had sensory ulnar nerve symptoms, and radiographic signs of mild olecranon wear was noted in five patients. Elbow hemiarthroplasty for comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures produces reliable medium-term results with functional outcome and complication rates, comparable with open reduction and internal fixation and total elbow arthroplasty.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY, 2015
National Category
Clinical Medicine Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-122788 (URN)10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35421 (DOI)000363600600013 ()26430013 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2015-11-23 Created: 2015-11-23 Last updated: 2018-02-20Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications