Checking whether a system of linear equations is consistent is a basic computational problem with ubiquitous applications. When dealing with inconsistent systems, one may seek an assignment that minimizes the number of unsatisfied equations. This problem is NP-hard and UGC-hard to approximate within any constant even for two-variable equations over the two-element field. We study this problem from the point of view of parameterized complexity, with the parameter being the number of unsatisfied equations. We consider equations defined over Euclidean domains—a family of commutative rings that generalize finite and infinite fields including the rationals, the ring of integers and many other structures. We show that if every equation contains at most two variables, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. This generalizes many eminent graph separation problems such as Bipartization, Multiway Cut and Multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset. To complement this, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard when three or more variables are allowed in an equation, as well as for many commutative rings that are not Euclidean domains. On the technical side, we introduce the notion of important balanced subgraphs, generalizing important separators of Marx [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2006] to the setting of biased graphs. Furthermore, we use recent results on parameterized MinCSP [Kim et al., SODA 2021] to efficiently solve a generalization of Multicut with disjunctive cut requests.

We study the fine-grained complexity of NP-complete, infinite-domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) parameterised by a set of first-order definable relations (with equality). Such CSPs are of central importance since they form a subclass of any infinite-domain CSP parameterised by a set of first-order definable relations over a relational structure (possibly containing more than just equality). We prove that under the randomised exponential-time hypothesis it is not possible to find c>1 such that a CSP over an arbitrary finite equality language is solvable in O(cn) time (n is the number of variables). Stronger lower bounds are possible for infinite equality languages where we rule out the existence of 2o(nlog⁡n) time algorithms; a lower bound which also extends to satisfiability modulo theories solving for an arbitrary background theory. Despite these lower bounds we prove that for each c>1 there exists an NP-hard equality CSP solvable in O(cn) time. Lower bounds like these immediately ask for closely matching upper bounds, and we prove that a CSP over a finite equality language is always solvable in O(cn) time for a fixed c, and manage to extend this algorithm to the much broader class of CSPs where constraints are formed by first-order formulas over a unary structure.

Constraint satisfaction problems form a nicely behaved class of problems that lends itself to complexity classification results. From the point of view of parameterized complexity, a natural task is to classify the parameterized complexity of MinCSP problems parameterized by the number of unsatisfied constraints. In other words, we ask whether we can delete at most k constraints, where k is the parameter, to get a satisfiable instance. In this work, we take a step towards classifying the parameterized complexity for an important infinite-domain CSP: Allen’s interval algebra (IA). This CSP has closed intervals with rational endpoints as domain values and employs a set A of 13 basic comparison relations such as "precedes" or "during" for relating intervals. IA is a highly influential and well-studied formalism within AI and qualitative reasoning that has numerous applications in, for instance, planning, natural language processing and molecular biology. We provide an FPT vs. W[1]-hard dichotomy for MinCSP(Γ) for all Γ ⊆ A. IA is sometimes extended with unions of the relations in A or first-order definable relations over A, but extending our results to these cases would require first solving the parameterized complexity of Directed Symmetric Multicut, which is a notorious open problem. Already in this limited setting, we uncover connections to new variants of graph cut and separation problems. This includes hardness proofs for simultaneous cuts or feedback arc set problems in directed graphs, as well as new tractable cases with algorithms based on the recently introduced flow augmentation technique. Given the intractability of MinCSP(A) in general, we then consider (parameterized) approximation algorithms. We first show that MinCSP(A) cannot be polynomial-time approximated within any constant factor and continue by presenting a factor-2 fpt-approximation algorithm. Once again, this algorithm has its roots in flow augmentation. 

Numeric planning is known to be undecidable even under severe restrictions. Prior work has investigated the decidability boundaries by restricting the expressiveness of the planning formalism in terms of the numeric functions allowed in conditions and effects. We study a well-known restricted form of Hoffmann's simple numeric planning, which is undecidable. We analyze the complexity by imposing restrictions on the causal structure, exploiting a novel method for bounding variable domain sizes. First, we show that plan existence for tasks where all numeric variables are root nodes in the causal graph is in PSPACE. Second, we show that for tasks with only numeric leaf variables the problem is decidable, and that it is in PSPACE if the propositional state space has a fixed size. Our work lays a strong foundation for future investigations of structurally more complex tasks. From a practical perspective, our method allows to employ heuristics and methods that are geared towards finite variable domains (such as pattern database heuristics or decoupled search) to solve non-trivial families of numeric planning problems.

Many computational problems arising in, for instance, artificial intelligence can be realized as infinite-domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) based on partition schemes: a set of pairwise disjoint binary relations (containing the equality relation) whose union spans the underlying domain and which is closed under converse. We first consider partition schemes that contain an acyclic order and where the constraint language contains all unions of the basic relations; such CSPs are frequently occurring in e.g. temporal and spatial reasoning. We identify properties of such orders which, when combined, are sufficient to establish NP-hardness of the CSP and strong lower bounds under the exponential-time hypothesis, even for degree-bounded problems. This result explains, in a uniform way, many existing hardness results from the literature, and shows that it is impossible to obtain subexponential time algorithms unless the exponential-time hypothesis fails. However, some of these problems (including several important temporal problems), despite likely not being solvable in subexponential time, admit non-trivial improved exponential-time algorithm, and we present a novel improved algorithm for RCC-8 and related formalisms.

Symmetry-based pruning is a powerful method for reducing the search effort in finitedomain planning. This method is based on exploiting an automorphism group connected to the ground description of the planning task - these automorphisms are known as structural symmetries. In particular, we are interested in the STRUCTSYM problem where the generators of this group are to be computed. It has been observed in practice that the STRUCTSYM problem is surprisingly easy to solve. We explain this phenomenon by showing that STRUCTSYM is GI-complete, i.e., the graph isomorphism problem is polynomial-time equivalent to it and, consequently, solvable in quasi-polynomial time. This implies that it is solvable substantially faster than most computationally hard problems encountered in AI. We accompany this result by identifying natural restrictions of the planning task and its causal graph that ensure that STRUCTSYM can be solved in polynomial time. Given that the STRUCTSYM problem is GI-complete and thus solvable quite efficiently, it is interesting to analyse if other symmetries (than those that are encompassed by the STRUCTSYM problem) can be computed and/or analysed efficiently, too. To this end, we present a highly negative result: checking whether there exists an automorphism of the state transition graph that maps one state s into another state t is a PSPACE-hard problem and, consequently, at least as hard as the planning problem itself.

A backdoor in a finite-domain CSP instance is a set of variables where each possible instantiation moves the instance into a polynomial-time solvable class. Backdoors have found many applications in artificial intelligence and elsewhere, and the algorithmic problem of finding such backdoors has consequently been intensively studied. Sioutis and Janhunen (KI, 2019) have proposed a generalised backdoor concept suitable for infinite-domain CSP instances over binary constraints. We generalise their concept into a large class of CSPs that allow for higher-arity constraints. We show that this kind of infinite-domain backdoors have many of the positive computational properties that finite-domain backdoors have: the associated computational problems are fixed-parameter tractable whenever the underlying constraint language is finite. On the other hand, we show that infinite languages make the problems considerably harder. 

Expressive temporal reasoning formalisms are essential for AI. One family of such formalisms consists of disjunctive extensions of the simple temporal problem (STP). Such extensions are well studied in the literature and they have many important applications. It is known that deciding satisfiability of disjunctive STPs is NP-hard, while the fine-grained complexity of such problems is virtually unexplored. We present novel algorithms that exploit structural properties of the solution space and prove, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, that their worst-case time complexity is close to optimal. Among other things, we make progress towards resolving a long-open question concerning whether Allens interval algebra can be solved in single-exponential time, by giving a 2(O(n log log n)) algorithm for the special case of unit-length intervals.

We study the fine-grained complexity of NP-complete, infinite-domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) parameterised by a set of first-order definable relations (with equality). Such CSPs are of central importance since they form a subclass of any infinite-domain CSP parameterised by a set of first-order definable relations. We prove that under the randomised exponential-time hypothesis it is not possible to find c > 1 such that a CSP over an arbitrary finite equality language is solvable in O(cn) time (n is the number of variables). Stronger lower bounds are possible for infinite equality languages where we rule out the existence of 2o(n log n) time algorithms; a lower bound which also extends to satisfiability modulo theories solving for an arbitrary background theory. Despite these lower bounds we prove that for each c > 1 there exists an NP-hard equality CSP solvable in O(cn) time. Lower bounds like these immediately ask for closely matching upper bounds, and we prove that a CSP over a finite equality language is always solvable in O(cn) time for a fixed c. © 2020 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved.