liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploitation and Remedial Duties
Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Culture and Aesthetics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Lund Univ, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Journal of Applied Philosophy, ISSN 0264-3758, E-ISSN 1468-5930Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The concept of exploitation and potentially exploitative real-world practices are the subject of increasing philosophical attention. However, while philosophers have extensively debated what exploitation is and what makes it wrong, they have said surprisingly little about what might be required to remediate it. By asking how the consequences of exploitation should be addressed, this article seeks to contribute to filling this gap. We raise two questions. First, what are the victims of exploitation owed by way of remediation? Second, who ought to remediate? Our answers to these questions are connected by the idea that exploitation cannot be fully remediated by redistributing the exploiters gain in order to repair or compensate the victims loss. This is because exploitation causes not only distributive but also relational harm. Therefore, redistributive measures are necessary but not sufficient for adequate remediation. Moreover, this relational focus highlights the fact that exploitative real-world practices commonly involve agents other than the exploiter who stand to benefit from the exploitation. Insofar as these third parties are implicated in the distributive and relational harms caused by exploitation, there is, we argue, good reason to assign part of the burden of remediation to them.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2019.
Keywords [en]
exploitation; harm; inequality; joint action; remedial duties
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-162741DOI: 10.1111/japp.12407ISI: 000499360000001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-162741DiVA, id: diva2:1380382
Note

Funding Agencies|Lund Gothenburg Responsibility Project (LGRP) - Swedish Research Council

Available from: 2019-12-18 Created: 2019-12-18 Last updated: 2020-01-22

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(221 kB)16 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 221 kBChecksum SHA-512
ea4bfda4858ce16e6d66becda4de46308adbc0aa6daa7c52803f5b70970fde7b08a1604d10b18da5a37d71ab75b47c1aab08f20416ce3ee3944d84725cf40785
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Szigeti, András
By organisation
Culture and AestheticsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 16 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf