liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Early intervention in whiplash-associated disorders - A comparison of two treatment protocols
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Neurology . Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Neurology.
2000 (English)In: Spine, ISSN 0362-2436, E-ISSN 1528-1159, Vol. 25, no 14, p. 1782-1786Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Study Design. A prospective randomized trial in 97 patients with a whiplash injury caused by a motor vehicle collision. Objectives. The study evaluates early active mobilization versus a standard treatment protocol and the importance of early versus delayed onset of treatment. Summary of Background Data. There is no compelling evidence to date on the management of acute whiplash-associated disorders. The few studies describing treatment, however, provide evidence to support the recommendation that an active treatment in the acute stage is preferable to rest and a soft collar in most patients. Methods. Patients were randomized to four groups. Active versus standard treatment and early (within 96 hours) versus delayed (after 2 weeks) treatment. Measures of range of motion and pain were registered initially and at 6 months. Results. Eighty-eight patients (91%) could be followed up at 6 months. Active treatment reduced pain more than standard treatment (P < 0.001). When type and onset of treatment were analyzed, a combined effect was seen. When active treatment was provided, it was better when administered early, and if standard treatment was provided, it was better when administered late for reduction of pain (P = 0.04) and increasing cervical flexion (P = 0.01). Conclusions. in patients with whiplash-associated disorders caused by a motor vehicle collision treatment with frequently repeated active submaximal movements combined with mechanical diagnosis and therapy is more effective in reducing pain than a standard program of initial rest, recommended use of a soft collar, and gradual self-mobilization. This therapy could be performed as home exercises initiated and supported by a physiotherapist.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 25, no 14, p. 1782-1786
Keywords [en]
neck injuries, whiplash injuries, whiplash injury complications, whiplash injury therapy
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-48360OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-48360DiVA, id: diva2:269256
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Borenstein, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borenstein, Peter
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesNeurology Department of Neurology
In the same journal
Spine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf