liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Skin-to-skin contact during eye examination did not reduce pain compared to standard care with parental support in preterm infants
Department of Neonatology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Neonatology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Neonatology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Acta Paediatrica, ISSN 0803-5253, E-ISSN 1651-2227, Vol. 108, nr 8, s. 1434-1440Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: We compared the pain relieving effect of skin-to-skin contact versus standard care in the incubator during screening for retinopathy of prematurity.

METHODS: This randomised crossover study included 35 preterm infants of less than 32 weeks of gestational age admitted to St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, between January 2014 and June 2016. Randomisation was for skin-to-skin with one of the parents or standard care with supportive positioning by parents for the first of two consecutive eye examinations. The pain score was measured twice using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) during and after the eye examination. The infants' movement activity was video recorded after the examination.

RESULTS: There was no difference in mean pain scores with skin-to-skin contact versus standard care during (10.2 vs. 10.3, p = 0.91) or after (7.0 vs. 6.8, p = 0.76) the procedure. Independent of the randomisation group, PIPP scores were lower than previous comparable studies have found. Bouts of movement activity were also the same whether the examination was conducted in skin-to-skin position or in the incubator (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSION: Skin-to-skin contact during the eye examination did not provide additional pain relief compared to standard care where the parents were already a part of the multidimensional approach.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2019. Vol. 108, nr 8, s. 1434-1440
Emneord [en]
Pain assessment, Pain relief, Preterm infant, Retinopathy of prematurity, Skin-to-skin contact
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-154598DOI: 10.1111/apa.14699ISI: 000474935600012PubMedID: 30561825Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85060225339OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-154598DiVA, id: diva2:1290601
Merknad

Funding agencies: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Central Norway Regional Health Authority

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-02-21 Laget: 2019-02-21 Sist oppdatert: 2020-04-30bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Theodorsson, Elvar

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Theodorsson, Elvar
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Acta Paediatrica

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 12 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf