liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strategic choice of manufacturing planning and control approaches: empirical analysis of drivers and performance
Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling.
Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling.
2007 (engelsk)Inngår i: Advances in Production Management Systems / [ed] Jan Olhager, Fredrik Persson, New York: Springer , 2007, s. 35-42Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

    

The design of manufacturing planning and control systems is a strategic decision for manufacturing firms. In this paper we analyze the interrelationships among the choices of planning and control approaches at different hierarchical levels, including sales and operations planning (chase; level), master scheduling (make-to-order; assemble-to-order; make-to-stock), material planning (time-phased; rate-based), and production activity control (MRP-type; JIT-type). We test the relationships with product characteristics and performance. These relationships are explored through a survey of 128 manufacturing plants.

The results show that choice of approaches at the two higher planning and control levels, i.e. sales and operations planning and master scheduling, are strongly interrelated. The choices at the two lower hierarchical levels, i.e. material planning and production activity control, are also strongly interrelated. However, the link between any of the two upper and any of the two lower levels is much weaker. The most significant drivers of the choice of planning and control approach are: (i) product volume and delivery lead time for sales and operations planning, (ii) product variants and delivery lead time for master scheduling, and (iii) production lead time for production activity control, while material planning is not significantly related with any product characteristic. Significant effects on performance are found for sales and operations planning on volume flexibility, master scheduling on product mix flexibility, and material planning and production activity control approaches on delivery speed. This research supports the notion that sales and operations planning is concerned with volume planning and that master scheduling is concerned with mix planning.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
New York: Springer , 2007. s. 35-42
Serie
IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, ISSN 1571-5736 ; 246
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-40181DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74157-4_5ISI: 000250478800005Lokal ID: 52559ISBN: 978-0-387-74156-7 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-40181DiVA, id: diva2:261030
Konferanse
International IFIP TC 5, WG 5.7 Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS 2007), September 17–19, Linköping, Sweden
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-10 Laget: 2009-10-10 Sist oppdatert: 2013-04-23

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Olhager, JanSelldin, Erik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Olhager, JanSelldin, Erik
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 70 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf