liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The PMA and relativizing minimal change for action update
Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, KPLAB - Laboratoriet för kunskapsbearbetning.
Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, KPLAB - Laboratoriet för kunskapsbearbetning.
2000 (engelsk)Inngår i: Fundamenta Informaticae, ISSN 0169-2968, E-ISSN 1875-8681, Vol. 44, nr 1-2, s. 95-131Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Recently, a great deal of progress has been made using nonmonotonic temporal logics to formalize reasoning about action and change. In particular, much focus has been placed on the proper representation of non-deterministic actions and the indirect effects of actions. For the latter the use of causal or fluent dependency rule approaches has been dominant. Although much recent effort has also been spent applying the belief revision/update (BR/U) approach to the action and change domain, there has been less progress in dealing with nondeterministic update and indirect effects represented as integrity constraints. We demonstrate that much is to be gained by cross-fertilization between the two paradigms and we show this in the following manner. We first propose a generalization of the PMA, called the modified MPMA which uses intuitions from the TL paradigm to permit representation of nondeterministic update and the use of integrity constraints interpreted as causal or fluent dependency rules. We provide several syntactic characterizations of MPMA, one of which is in terms of a simple temporal logic and provide a representation theorem showing equivalence between the two. In constructing the MPMA, we discovered a syntactic anomaly which we call the redundant atom anomaly that many TL approaches suffer from. We provide a method for avoiding the problem which is equally applicable across paradigms. We also describe a syntactic characterization of MPMA in terms of Dijkstra semantics. We set up a framework for future generalization of the BR/U approach and conclude with a formal comparison of related approaches.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
IOS Press , 2000. Vol. 44, nr 1-2, s. 95-131
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-41624Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0041162663Lokal ID: 58417OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-41624DiVA, id: diva2:262478
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-10 Laget: 2009-10-10 Sist oppdatert: 2018-01-12

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Scopus

Person

Doherty, PatrickLukaszewicz, Witold

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Doherty, PatrickLukaszewicz, Witold
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Fundamenta Informaticae

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 253 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf