liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, Statistik. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten. Statens Kriminaltekniska Laboratorium, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin, Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet. Statens Kriminaltekniska Laboratorium, Linköping, Sweden.
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Law, Probability and Risk, ISSN 1470-8396, E-ISSN 1470-840X, Vol. 11, s. 303-315Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The ability of the experienced forensic scientist to evaluate his or her results given the circumstances and propositions in a particular case and present this to the court in a clear and concise way is very important for the legal process. Court officials can neither be expected to be able to interpret scientific data, nor is it their task to do so (in our opinion). The duty of the court is rather to perform the ultimate evidence evaluation of all the information in the case combined, including police reports, statements from suspects and victims, witness reports forensic expert statements, etc. Without the aid of the forensic expert, valuable forensic results may be overlooked or misinterpreted in this process. The scientific framework for forensic interpretation stems from Bayesian theory. The resulting likelihood ratio, which may be expressed using a verbal or a numerical scale, compares how frequent are the obtained results given that one of the propositions holds with how frequent  they are given that the other proposition holds. A common misunderstanding is that this approach must be restricted to forensic areas such as DNA evidence where extensive background information is present in the form of comprehensive databases. In this article we argue that the approach with likelihood ratios is equally applicable in areas where the results rely on scientific background data combined with the knowledge and experience of the forensic scientist. In such forensic areas the scale of the likelihood ratio may be rougher compared to a DNA case, but the information that is conveyed by the likelihood ratio may     nevertheless be highly valuable for the court.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Vol. 11, s. 303-315
Emneord [en]
forensic interpretation, Bayes' theorem, logical approach, evidence value, likelihood, assessment
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79770DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgs019ISI: 000415178700005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-79770DiVA, id: diva2:544272
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-08-14 Laget: 2012-08-14 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-09

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Nordgaard, Anders

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nordgaard, AndersRasmusson, Birgitta
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Law, Probability and Risk

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 152 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf