liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Improper study design precludes valid effect estimates in important suicide prevention research
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicin. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Emotra AB Ltd, Sweden.
Karl Wahlin AB, Sweden.
Mdas AB, Sweden.
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, ISSN 1049-8931, E-ISSN 1557-0657, Vol. 28, nr 3, artikel-id e1786Artikel i tidskrift, Letter (Övrigt vetenskapligt) Published
Abstract [en]

The observational study design for estimating accuracy of diagnostic tests for suicide risk in clinical work is not ideal, due to the effects of directed suicide prevention to the high-risk group. This is an example of the confounding by indication and protopathic bias, which lead to misinterpretation of the accuracy terms sensitivity and specificity. The simple arithmetic mechanism presented here, forces the conclusion that the accuracy estimates sensitivity and specificity, applied in open prospective trials of surmised diagnostic tests for suicide risk, cannot be normally interpreted as accuracy estimators. Further, the related concept "prediction of suicide" is shown to be fundamentally illogical and should not be used in the present context. All these statements reveal a far-reaching problem within the suicide prevention research: Conclusions regarding the usefulness of diagnostic tests of suicide risk in the vast previous research since decades deserve reinterpretation. Diagnostic tests per se, can possess highly qualitative properties in estimating important suicidological aspects regarding a patient, but, when studied in an open design study, it cannot be demonstrated. This problem concerns rating scales and any biological and psychological tests in medicine, when confounding factors, for example, suicide prevention, influence the outcome because of the test result per se.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Vol. 28, nr 3, artikel-id e1786
Nyckelord [en]
confounding by indication; naturalistic studies; sensitivity; suicide prevention research; trials of diagnostic tests for suicide risk
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykiatri
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161864DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1786ISI: 000492720900013PubMedID: 31144394Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85066466243OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-161864DiVA, id: diva2:1374094
Tillgänglig från: 2019-11-28 Skapad: 2019-11-28 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-04-30Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Thorell, Lars-Håkan

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Thorell, Lars-Håkan
Av organisationen
Institutionen för klinisk och experimentell medicinMedicinska fakulteten
I samma tidskrift
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Psykiatri

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf