liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intention in Hybrid Organizations: The Diffusion of the Business Metaphor in Swedish Laws
Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden .
Lund University, Sweden .
Lund University, Sweden .
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, ISSN 0952-8059, E-ISSN 1572-8722, Vol. 28, nr 2, s. 371-386Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent studies of conceptual metaphors in a legal context have often dealt with the power of embodiment. However, the connotations of culturally originated metaphors could be different when they appear in laws and regulations. In particular, the role of metaphor when the legislator wishes to define intention in hybrid organizations is investigated here. The case studied is how a conceptual metaphor of ‘business’ manifesting itself in the Swedish simile adjective affärsmässig (businesslike) has spread over 40 years. ‘Business’ early on acquired connotations such as impartiality and methodical approach, and can be used metaphorically. Introduced in the regulation of public procurement, ‘businesslike’ was later used to regulate conflicts of interest, restrict state aid and also entered tax legislation. Analysis of Swedish court decisions where ‘businesslike’ occurs shows how the emphasis has shifted from public sector efficiency to neo-liberal principles of competition, while stronger social norms related to environmental effects have led to the term being removed from the Public Procurement Act. Elements of a mixed jurisdiction arise from reliance on EU case-law, and national use of ambiguous cultural metaphors in legal texts and court decisions is a plausible response.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Netherlands, 2015. Vol. 28, nr 2, s. 371-386
Nyckelord [en]
Legal metaphor, Business, Sweden, Appeal cases
Nationell ämneskategori
Juridik och samhälle
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-107722DOI: 10.1007/s11196-013-9343-8OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-107722DiVA, id: diva2:726997
Tillgänglig från: 2014-06-19 Skapad: 2014-06-19 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-10-15

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Åström, Karsten

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Åström, Karsten
I samma tidskrift
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
Juridik och samhälle

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 99 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf