liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beware of the origin of numbers: Standard scoring of the SF-12 and SF-36 summary measures distorts measurement and score interpretations
Kristianstad University, Sweden.
Kristianstad University, Sweden.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för omvårdnad. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. Linnaeus University, Sweden.
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Research in Nursing & Health, ISSN 0160-6891, E-ISSN 1098-240X, Vol. 40, nr 4, s. 378-386Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a generic health rating scale developed to reproduce the Physical and Mental Component Summary scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) of a longer survey, the SF-36. The standard PCS/MCS scoring algorithm has been criticized because its expected dimensionality often lacks empirical support, scoring is based on the assumption that physical and mental health are uncorrelated, and because scores on physical health items influence MCS scores, and vice versa. In this paper, we review the standard PCS/MCS scoring algorithm for the SF-12 and consider alternative scoring procedures: the RAND-12 Health Status Inventory (HSI) and raw sum scores. We corroborate that the SF-12 reproduces SF-36 scores but also inherits its problems. In simulations, good physical health scores reduce mental health scores, and vice versa. This may explain results of clinical studies in which, for example, poor physical health scores result in good MCS scores despite compromised mental health. When applied to empirical data from people with Parkinsons disease (PD) and stroke, standard SF-12 scores suggest a weak correlation between physical and mental health (r(s). 16), whereas RAND-12 HSI and raw sum scores show a much stronger correlation (r(s). 67-.68). Furthermore, standard PCS scores yield a different statistical conclusion regarding the association between physical health and age than do RAND-12 HSI and raw sum scores. We recommend that the standard SF-12 scoring algorithm be abandoned in favor of alternatives that provide more valid representations of physical and mental health, of which raw sum scores appear the simplest.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
WILEY , 2017. Vol. 40, nr 4, s. 378-386
Nyckelord [en]
epidemiology; health status; instrument development and validation; quality of life
Nationell ämneskategori
Omvårdnad
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-139805DOI: 10.1002/nur.21806ISI: 000406119100010PubMedID: 28732149OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-139805DiVA, id: diva2:1133921
Anmärkning

Funding Agencies|Skane County Council Research and Development Foundation; Swedish Parkinson Academy; Kristianstad University; Linnaeus University; Swedish Research Council; Swedish Parkinson Foundation

Tillgänglig från: 2017-08-17 Skapad: 2017-08-17 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-08-17

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Årestedt, Kristofer
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för omvårdnadMedicinska fakulteten
I samma tidskrift
Research in Nursing & Health
Omvårdnad

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 61 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf