liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The use of court- and party-appointed experts in legal proceedings in Sweden: the judges experiences and attitudes
Senior lecturer in Sociology of Law, Lund University.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier, Socialt arbete. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Oslo Law Review, E-ISSN 2387-3299, Vol. 4, nr 2, s. 63-81Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

This article focuses on the use of expert knowledge as a basis for legal decisions in serious criminal cases. Using a model that describes rhetorical situations, as well as empirical material based on 150 court decisions, the aim is to analyse the conditions surrounding the use of expert evidence in criminal law processes, to what extent and by whom such evidence is used, and how it affects the outcome of the cases. The rhetorical situation in criminal cases is reconstructed to include the exigence (urgent issue that requires addressing) and, thereby, the related discourse, in order to retrieve relevant conditions, which could be identified as evidentially favourable or unfavourable to the suspect and the prosecutor respectively. It is concluded that there is a theoretical imbalance between the parties to the benefit of the defendant. Empirically grounded analysis of the criminal cases shows, however, that the defendant’s theoretical advantage does not correspond to the actual situation in court. The results indicate that the defendant usually adopts a passive stance and therefore does not use favourable constraints effectively. The study also shows that the defendant’s chances of winning the case increase when they use written expert evidence and expert witnesses.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Oslo, Norway: Universitetet i Oslo , 2017. Vol. 4, nr 2, s. 63-81
Nyckelord [en]
Legal reasoning; expert knowledge; criminal law process; rhetorical situation; rhetorical constraints
Nationell ämneskategori
Juridik och samhälle
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-141954DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-02-01OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-141954DiVA, id: diva2:1149297
Forskningsfinansiär
VetenskapsrådetTillgänglig från: 2017-10-15 Skapad: 2017-10-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-05-14Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1277 kB)77 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 1277 kBChecksumma SHA-512
dff3c0ed8ecdf2ae994099dbaadd2a85a3e4b657854798a79d65fb42d1f4ebb907380a2f4822056ab561a2b8608c73a7e3943d288d2aca41607dda9358f924ba
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Åström, Karsten

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Åström, Karsten
Av organisationen
Socialt arbeteFilosofiska fakulteten
Juridik och samhälle

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 77 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 137 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf