liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The clinical applicability of a daily summary of patients self-reported postoperative painA repeated measure analysis
Jonköping University, Sweden; Ryhov County Hospital, Sweden.
Jonköping University, Sweden; Ryhov County Hospital, Sweden.
Jonköping University, Sweden.
Futurum Academic Health and Care, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 26, no 23-24, p. 4675-4684Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim and objectives(i) To determine whether a central tendency, median, based on patients self-rated pain is a clinically applicable daily measure to show patients postoperative pain on the first day after major surgery (ii) and to determine the number of self-ratings required for the calculation of this measure. BackgroundPerioperative pain traits in medical records are difficult to overview. The clinical applicability of a daily documented summarising measure of patients self-rated pain scores is little explored. DesignA repeated measure design was carried out at three Swedish country hospitals. MethodsAssociations between the measures were analysed with nonparametric statistical methods; systematic and individual group changes were analysed separately. Measure I: pain scores at rest and activity postoperative day 1; measure II: retrospective average pain from postoperative day 1. ResultsThe sample consisted of 190 general surgery patients and 289 orthopaedic surgery patients with a mean age of 65; 56% were men. Forty-four percent had a pre-operative daily intake of analgesia, and 77% used postoperative opioids. A range of 49 pain scores seem to be eligible for the calculation of the daily measures of pain. Rank correlations for individual median scores, based on four ratings, vs. retrospective self-rated average pain, were moderate and strengthened with increased numbers of ratings. A systematic group change towards a higher level of reported retrospective pain was significant. ConclusionsThe median values were clinically applicable daily measures. The risk of obtaining a higher value than was recalled by patients seemed to be low. Applicability increased with increased frequency of self-rated pain scores and with high-quality pain assessments. Relevance to clinical practiceThe documenting of daily median pain scores at rest and during activity could constitute the basis for obtaining patients experiences by showing their pain severity trajectories. The measures could also be an important key to predicting postoperative health-related consequences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2017. Vol. 26, no 23-24, p. 4675-4684
Keywords [en]
documentation; numerical rating scale; pain; repeated measures; self-rated
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-143932DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13818ISI: 000416319600080PubMedID: 28334471OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-143932DiVA, id: diva2:1169780
Note

Funding Agencies|Academy for Health Care County Council of Jonkoping, Sweden; Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS)

Available from: 2017-12-29 Created: 2017-12-29 Last updated: 2018-05-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Årestedt, KristoferBroström, Anders
By organisation
Division of Nursing ScienceFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf