liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring ethical rationales
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten. University of Boras, Sweden. (Prioriteringscentrum)ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0987-7653
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Canada.
The Norwegian University for Science and Technology Gjovik, Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo Norway.
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Patient invovlement in Health Technology Assessment / [ed] Karen Facey, Helle Ploug Hansen and Ann Single, Singapore: Springer Nature , 2017, s. 17-29Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

This chapter presents and analyses six ethical rationales for patient involvement in HTA. We have identified three instrumental and three substantive rationales, namely, (1) relevance to healthcare goals and healthcare needs, (2) legitimacy leading to adherence to decisions, (3) capacity building via patient empowerment, (4) fairness and legitimacy through democratic participation, (5) fairness through respect for autonomy and (6) equity. Our ethical analysis finds that these rationales support patient involvement in HTA under specific premises. For example, relevance to healthcare goals and needs mainly support the use of patient-based evidence, while the other rationales require patient participation in some form. That is, for HTA to be legitimate enough to increase adherence, patients probably need to participate in the process and the same goes for equity. Likewise, when the rationales are democratic participation, empowerment and autonomy. Importantly, in order to achieve strong ethical support for patient involvement in HTA, it is crucial to ensure that these premises and their preconditions are fulfilled. On the other hand, all rationales raise issues of representation, i.e. which patient group should be represented through evidence or participation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Singapore: Springer Nature , 2017. s. 17-29
Emneord [en]
Selection Problem, Ethical Rationale, Patient Involvement, Patient Participation, Patient Representative
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-145623DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_2ISBN: 9789811040672 (tryckt)ISBN: 9789811040689 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-145623DiVA, id: diva2:1188873
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-08 Laget: 2018-03-08 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-27bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Sandman, Lars
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 8 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf