liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Abdominal symptoms and cancer in the abdomen: prospective cohort study in European primary care
UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Norway.
Aarhus Univ, Denmark.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
NIVEL Primary Care Database, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: British Journal of General Practice, ISSN 0960-1643, E-ISSN 1478-5242, Vol. 68, no 670, p. E301-E310Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Different abdominal symptoms may signal cancer, but their role is unclear. Aim To examine associations between abdominal symptoms and subsequent cancer diagnosed in the abdominal region. Design and setting Prospective cohort study comprising 493 GPs from surgeries in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Scotland, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Method Over a 10-day period, the GPs recorded consecutive consultations and noted: patients who presented with abdominal symptoms prespecified on the registration form; additional data on non-specific symptoms; and features of the consultation. Eight months later, data on all cancer diagnoses among all study patients in the participating general practices were requested from the GPs. Results Consultations with 61 802 patients were recorded and abdominal symptoms were documented in 6264 (10.1%) patients. Malignancy, both abdominal and non-abdominal, was subsequently diagnosed in 511 patients (0.8%). Among patients with a new cancer in the abdomen (n = 251), 175 (69.7%) were diagnosed within 180 days after consultation. In a multivariate model, the highest sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was for the single symptom of rectal bleeding (HR 19.1, 95% confidence interval = 8.7 to 41.7). Positive predictive values of amp;gt; 3% were found for macroscopic haematuria, rectal bleeding, and involuntary weight loss, with variations according to age and sex. The three symptoms relating to irregular bleeding had particularly high specificity in terms of colorectal, uterine, and bladder cancer. Conclusions A patient with undiagnosed cancer may present with symptoms or no symptoms. Irregular bleeding must always be explained. Abdominal pain occurs with all types of abdominal cancer and several symptoms may signal colorectal cancer. The findings are important as they influence how GPs think and act, and how they can contribute to an earlier diagnosis of cancer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS , 2018. Vol. 68, no 670, p. E301-E310
Keywords [en]
cancer; early diagnosis; general practice; proportional hazard models; symptoms
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-147916DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695777ISI: 000430972900001PubMedID: 29632003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-147916DiVA, id: diva2:1209574
Note

Funding Agencies|Norwegian Research Council [202663]; Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Available from: 2018-05-23 Created: 2018-05-23 Last updated: 2019-04-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgquist, Lars
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
British Journal of General Practice
General Practice

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf