liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Increasing return-to-work among people on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving intervention versus care-as-usual conducted in the Swedish primary health care system (PROSA)
Karolinska Inst, Sweden; Univ Gothenburg, Sweden; Narhalsan, Sweden.
Narhalsan, Sweden; Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Netherlands.
Karolinska Inst, Sweden; Univ Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 18, article id 889Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Common mental disorders affect about one-third of the European working-age population and are one of the leading causes of sick leave in Sweden and other OECD countries. Besides the individual suffering, the costs for society are high. This paper describes the design of a study to evaluate a work-related, problem-solving intervention provided at primary health care centers for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders. Methods: The study has a two-armed cluster randomized design in which the participating rehabilitation coordinators are randomized into delivering the intervention or providing care-as-usual. Employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders will be recruited by an independent research assistant. The intervention aims to improve the employees return-to-work process by identifying problems perceived as hindering return-to-work and finding solutions. The rehabilitation coordinator facilitates a participatory approach, in which the employee and the employer together identify obstacles and solutions in relation to the work situation. The primary outcome is total number of sick leave days during the 18-month follow-up after inclusion. A long-term follow-up at 36 months is planned. Secondary outcomes are short-term sick leave (min. 2 weeks and max. 12 weeks), psychological symptoms, work ability, presenteeism and health related quality of life assessed at baseline, 6 and 12-month follow-up. Intervention fidelity, reach, dose delivered and dose received will be examined in a process evaluation. An economic evaluation will put health-related quality of life and sick leave in relation to costs from the perspectives of society and health care services. A parallel ethical evaluation will focus on the interventions consequences for patient autonomy, privacy, equality, fairness and professional ethos and integrity. Discussion: The study is a pragmatic trial which will include analyses of the interventions effectiveness, and a process evaluation in primary health care settings. Methodological strengths and challenges are discussed, such as the risk of selection bias, contamination and detection bias. If the intervention shows promising results for return-to-work, the prospects are good for implementing the intervention in routine primary health care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2018. Vol. 18, article id 889
Keywords [en]
Common mental disorders; Adjustment disorders; Anxiety disorders; Depression; Cluster-randomized trial; Problem solving skills; Return to work; Sick leave; Economic evaluation; Ethical evaluation
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-150262DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5816-8ISI: 000439348500002PubMedID: 30021545OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-150262DiVA, id: diva2:1239762
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2016-07415, 2018-01252]

Available from: 2018-08-17 Created: 2018-08-17 Last updated: 2019-06-27

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(767 kB)66 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 767 kBChecksum SHA-512
1e3f3fbd288461d62ea84a98bc7ca86a4a50f2176831636e3059a90be0ce61e1f96b8ab951d840cb30353b59404f614419e070fd1c7dedc334bb7e5874e732f5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandman, Lars
By organisation
Division of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 66 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 111 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf