liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Our surgeons want this to be short and simple: practices of in-hospital medication review as coordinated sociomaterial actions
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8782-0751
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0587-3399
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5066-8728
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Studies in Continuing Education, ISSN 0158-037X, E-ISSN 1470-126X, Vol. 40, no 3, p. 323-336Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Medication review, a systematic assessment of a patients medicines by a health care professional, is intended to prevent medication-related harms. A critical element of medication review concerns whether medication review is conducted in a coordinated way. This article draws from a case example of implementing medication review in two surgical wards of a Swedish regional hospital and aims to analyse how medication review is being accomplished with respect to the coordination of its actions. Using a practice-based ethnographic approach, we present several coordination mechanisms by illustrating how practices are connected to materials involved in medication review. Also, we show how common orientations, ends, and understandings expressed in different medication review practices contribute to the coordination of the practices. In conclusion, this article highlights the complexity of establishing and sustaining medication review as a coordinated practice in routine health care. By closely examining sociomaterial connections, this article sheds new light on the neglected issue of artefacts and arrangements in constituting and transforming a highly complex medication practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2018. Vol. 40, no 3, p. 323-336
Keywords [en]
Ethnography; practice theory; sociomateriality; coordination; medication safety; implementation
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-151230DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1458710ISI: 000442433800007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-151230DiVA, id: diva2:1247997
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte) [2014-4657]; Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS) [FORSS-476971, FORSS-568651]; County Council of Ostergotlands patient safety research fund (Region Ostergotlands Medel for Patientsakerhetsforskning) [LIO-533151, LIO-626451]

Available from: 2018-09-13 Created: 2018-09-13 Last updated: 2019-04-10
In thesis
1. Embedding Medication Review in Clinical Practice: Reconceptualising Implementation Using a Practice Theory Perspective
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Embedding Medication Review in Clinical Practice: Reconceptualising Implementation Using a Practice Theory Perspective
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The hospital is a critical setting with respect to medication safety and quality of medication therapy. Medication review, the structured assessment of an individual patient’s medications with the aim of improving therapy, has been advocated as a strategy to reduce medication-related harm. Although programs of medication review have been widely introduced, its implementation has encountered difficulties. While seemingly a rather straightforward concept, processes to identify current medication use and reconcile different medication lists have been complicated by organizational, interprofessional, or technical factors. There is, thus, a need to better understand medication review implementation. However, it is also important to critically consider how the implementation of healthcare interventions is generally understood, and what theoretical or conceptual considerations inform implementation efforts. Studying organizational and social phenomena as they unfold in practice has the potential to shed light on how these everyday activities are generated, how they are adapted over time, and what consequences this has on social and organizational processes.

The purpose of this thesis is to develop an alternative perspective on studying the implementation of a healthcare intervention in routine care. More specifically, this thesis aims to theorize the embedding and practicing of medication review in routine hospital work. Theorizing, here, refers to empirically and theoretically exploring phenomena based on cases of local medication review implementation.

Drawing on empirical case examples of medication review implementation in southeast Sweden, an ethnographic approach is employed conducting participant observation, informal conversations and semi-structured interviews with different healthcare professionals in two hospital settings, as well as semi-structured interviews with patients from three different hospital settings. A so-called toolkit approach for practice theory is employed, using a range of different practice-theoretical concepts to empirically study practice.

The empirical findings point to the centrality of dealing with medication-related problems when conducting and embedding medication review. Both practicing and embedding medication review were shaped by how medication-related problems and potential medication harms were constructed, contested, and negotiated in practice. Practitioners’ everyday actions and practices revealed different meanings attached to the concept of medication-related problem bringing to the fore the contested and conflictual nature of the practice. Also, insight was provided into how practices to embed medication review in routine hospital work unfolded, revealing material-discursive and reflective practices, but also silent modes of legitimizing the ‘non-practicing’ of medication review in a highly structured way.

This thesis provides an alternative perspective on studying the implementation of a healthcare intervention and challenges various assumptions underpinning implementation research. Instead, a broadened perspective is suggested directing attention to the practical and situated knowing involved, the local processes of negotiating objectives in practice, as well as to the meaning-making required when practitioners engage with a practice. Finally, there are opportunities to learn from implementation processes, when frontline practitioners involved in embedding medication review are able to reflect on adapting medication review to make routines better fit the local context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2019. p. 98
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1684
Keywords
Ethnographic approach; practice theory; professional practice; sociomateriality; implementation; medication safety; patients; organization
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-156274 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-156274 (DOI)9789176850657 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-06-04, Hasselquistsalen, Hus 511 , Våning 9 , Ingång 76 ,78, Campus US, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014-4657Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), 476971Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), 568651Region Östergötland, 533151Region Östergötland, 626451
Available from: 2019-05-02 Created: 2019-04-10 Last updated: 2019-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(175 kB)1 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 175 kBChecksum SHA-512
7c409b59b48ce5473bb11110f3dc9942de031e7dad5c23c68d1b03c9fd2db35050c22843ab29e2cdee35337d00aa1d38c727dffe8546aa63630fc1348c9641ce
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Carlfjord, Siw

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Reichenpfader, UrsulaWickström, AnetteAbrandt Dahlgren, MadeleineNilsen, PerCarlfjord, Siw
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Child StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Studies in Continuing Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf