liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Medi(c)ation work in the emergency department: Making standardized practice work
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8782-0751
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0587-3399
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5066-8728
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Professions & Professionalism, ISSN 1893-1049, E-ISSN 1893-1049, Vol. 8, no 2, article id e2298Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Medication review, the systematic examination of an individual patient’s medicines in order to improve medication therapy, has been advocated as an important patient safety measure. Despite widespread use, little is known about how medication review is conducted when implemented in routine health care. Drawing from an ethnographic case study in a Swedish emergency department and using a practice-based approach, we examine how medication review is practically accomplished and how knowledge is mobilized in everyday practice. We show how physicians construct and negotiate medication safety through situated practices and thereby generate knowledge through mundane activities. We illustrate the centrality of practitioners’ collective reflexive work when co-constructing meaning and argue here that practitioners’ local adaptations can serve as important prerequisites to make “standardized” practice function in everyday work. Organizations need to build a practical capacity to support practitioners’ work-based learning in messy and time-pressured  health care  settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 8, no 2, article id e2298
Keywords [en]
practice-based study, ethnography, practical knowledge, professional practice, medication review, implementation, patient safety
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-151815DOI: 10.7577/pp.2298OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-151815DiVA, id: diva2:1253249
Available from: 2018-10-04 Created: 2018-10-04 Last updated: 2019-05-01
In thesis
1. Embedding Medication Review in Clinical Practice: Reconceptualising Implementation Using a Practice Theory Perspective
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Embedding Medication Review in Clinical Practice: Reconceptualising Implementation Using a Practice Theory Perspective
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The hospital is a critical setting with respect to medication safety and quality of medication therapy. Medication review, the structured assessment of an individual patient’s medications with the aim of improving therapy, has been advocated as a strategy to reduce medication-related harm. Although programs of medication review have been widely introduced, its implementation has encountered difficulties. While seemingly a rather straightforward concept, processes to identify current medication use and reconcile different medication lists have been complicated by organizational, interprofessional, or technical factors. There is, thus, a need to better understand medication review implementation. However, it is also important to critically consider how the implementation of healthcare interventions is generally understood, and what theoretical or conceptual considerations inform implementation efforts. Studying organizational and social phenomena as they unfold in practice has the potential to shed light on how these everyday activities are generated, how they are adapted over time, and what consequences this has on social and organizational processes.

The purpose of this thesis is to develop an alternative perspective on studying the implementation of a healthcare intervention in routine care. More specifically, this thesis aims to theorize the embedding and practicing of medication review in routine hospital work. Theorizing, here, refers to empirically and theoretically exploring phenomena based on cases of local medication review implementation.

Drawing on empirical case examples of medication review implementation in southeast Sweden, an ethnographic approach is employed conducting participant observation, informal conversations and semi-structured interviews with different healthcare professionals in two hospital settings, as well as semi-structured interviews with patients from three different hospital settings. A so-called toolkit approach for practice theory is employed, using a range of different practice-theoretical concepts to empirically study practice.

The empirical findings point to the centrality of dealing with medication-related problems when conducting and embedding medication review. Both practicing and embedding medication review were shaped by how medication-related problems and potential medication harms were constructed, contested, and negotiated in practice. Practitioners’ everyday actions and practices revealed different meanings attached to the concept of medication-related problem bringing to the fore the contested and conflictual nature of the practice. Also, insight was provided into how practices to embed medication review in routine hospital work unfolded, revealing material-discursive and reflective practices, but also silent modes of legitimizing the ‘non-practicing’ of medication review in a highly structured way.

This thesis provides an alternative perspective on studying the implementation of a healthcare intervention and challenges various assumptions underpinning implementation research. Instead, a broadened perspective is suggested directing attention to the practical and situated knowing involved, the local processes of negotiating objectives in practice, as well as to the meaning-making required when practitioners engage with a practice. Finally, there are opportunities to learn from implementation processes, when frontline practitioners involved in embedding medication review are able to reflect on adapting medication review to make routines better fit the local context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2019. p. 98
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1684
Keywords
Ethnographic approach; practice theory; professional practice; sociomateriality; implementation; medication safety; patients; organization
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-156274 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-156274 (DOI)9789176850657 (ISBN)
Public defence
2019-06-04, Hasselquistsalen, Hus 511 , Våning 9 , Ingång 76 ,78, Campus US, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2014-4657Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), 476971Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), 568651Region Östergötland, 533151Region Östergötland, 626451
Available from: 2019-05-02 Created: 2019-04-10 Last updated: 2019-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(957 kB)65 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 957 kBChecksum SHA-512
e8e5f444946e697bac8f5c04f4de8c5924be434cd3bc83947bf935d6e6f71d797e83d18726477e46b3e957c1188c4c1d589ff66d5e36dab9412064e94311ed23
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Reichenpfader, UrsulaWickström, AnetteNilsen, PerAbrandt Dahlgren, MadeleineCarlfjord, Siw

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Reichenpfader, UrsulaWickström, AnetteNilsen, PerAbrandt Dahlgren, MadeleineCarlfjord, Siw
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Child StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Professions & Professionalism
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 65 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 112 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf