liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic review of recent developments in disaster waste management
Jinan Univ, Peoples R China.
Chongqing Technol and Business Univ, Peoples R China; Tianjin Univ, Peoples R China.
Jinan Univ, Peoples R China.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. Jinan Univ, Peoples R China; Univ Vaasa, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8006-3236
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 235, p. 822-840Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Disaster waste management received increasing attention in recent years, but there was no review updating the evolving development after the study of Brown et al. (2011a). To explore how the topics in disaster waste management evolved in recent years and to analyze whether the gaps identified by Brown et al. (2011a) are covered, 82 papers published from 2011 to 2019 were selected from the Scopus database based on the defined process and criteria. This paper systematically examines the disaster waste management research from nine aspects of planning, waste, waste treatment options, environment, economics, social considerations, organizational aspects, legal frameworks and funding. The results suggested that there were no obvious changes or developments in the field of disaster waste management, although a few research gaps have been addressed, such as waste separation, waste quantities, case studies of incineration and waste to energy, direct economic effects, social considerations as well as application of GIS technology. Except for the comparative studies, future directions were suggested by the gaps that persist since Brown et al. (2011a) and the new gaps that were identified in this review. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2019. Vol. 235, p. 822-840
Keywords [en]
Waste management; Disaster context; Systematic review
National Category
Environmental Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-160380DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.229ISI: 000482491500069OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-160380DiVA, id: diva2:1353587
Note

Funding Agencies|National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672074]; Scientific Research Start-up Foundation for Introduction of Advanced Talents in Chongqing Technology and Business University [1955011]; Research Project of Chongqing Technology and Business University; Twelfth Five-Year Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province [GD15CGL07]

Available from: 2019-09-23 Created: 2019-09-23 Last updated: 2019-09-23

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liu, Yang
By organisation
Environmental Technology and ManagementFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Environmental Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf