liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Oticon AS, Denmark.
Univ Nottingham, Scotland.
Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, MD USA.
Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Israel.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Ear and Hearing, ISSN 0196-0202, E-ISSN 1538-4667, Vol. 41, p. 5S-19SArticle in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ecological validity is a relatively new concept in hearing science. It has been cited as relevant with increasing frequency in publications over the past 20 years, but without any formal conceptual basis or clear motive. The sixth Eriksholm Workshop was convened to develop a deeper understanding of the concept for the purpose of applying it in hearing research in a consistent and productive manner. Inspired by relevant debate within the field of psychology, and taking into account the World Health Organizations International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework, the attendees at the workshop reached a consensus on the following definition: "In hearing science, ecological validity refers to the degree to which research findings reflect real-life hearing-related function, activity, or participation." Four broad purposes for striving for greater ecological validity in hearing research were determined: A (Understanding) better understanding the role of hearing in everyday life; B (Development) supporting the development of improved procedures and interventions; C (Assessment) facilitating improved methods for assessing and predicting ability to accomplish real-world tasks; and D (Integration and Individualization) enabling more integrated and individualized care. Discussions considered the effects of variables and phenomena commonly present in hearing-related research on the level of ecological validity of outcomes, supported by examples from a few selected outcome domains and for different types of studies. Illustrated with examples, potential strategies were offered for promoting a high level of ecological validity in a study and for how to evaluate the level of ecological validity of a study. Areas in particular that could benefit from more research to advance ecological validity in hearing science include: (1) understanding the processes of hearing and communication in everyday listening situations, and specifically the factors that make listening difficult in everyday situations; (2) developing new test paradigms that include more than one person (e.g., to encompass the interactive nature of everyday communication) and that are integrative of other factors that interact with hearing in real-life function; (3) integrating new and emerging technologies (e.g., virtual reality) with established test methods; and (4) identifying the key variables and phenomena affecting the level of ecological validity to develop verifiable ways to increase ecological validity and derive a set of benchmarks to strive for.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS , 2020. Vol. 41, p. 5S-19S
Keywords [en]
Amplification; Ecological validity; Field study; Hearing; Hearing science; Hybrid study; Laboratory study; Outcome domains; Research; Test variables
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-173516DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000944ISI: 000613504900002PubMedID: 33105255OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-173516DiVA, id: diva2:1530300
Note

Funding Agencies|William Demant Foundation; Medical Research CouncilUK Research & Innovation (UKRI)Medical Research Council UK (MRC) [MR/S003576/1]; Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government; USA Government; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)German Research Foundation (DFG) [352015383-SFB 1330]

Available from: 2021-02-22 Created: 2021-02-22 Last updated: 2021-02-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Keidser, Gitte
By organisation
Disability ResearchFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Ear and Hearing
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf