liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholders experience of collaboration in the context of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with chronic pain aiming at return to work
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Pain and Rehabilitation Center.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Pain and Rehabilitation Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2980-2835
Danderyd Hosp, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Pain and Rehabilitation Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1607-187X
2022 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 44, no 26, p. 8388-8399Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and purpose Chronic pain is a major reason for sick leave worldwide. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs), workplace interventions, and stakeholder collaboration may support patients in their return to work (RTW). Few studies have examined stakeholders experiences of important components in the RTW rehabilitation process for patients with chronic pain, especially in the context of IPRP. This study explores and describes stakeholders experiences with stakeholder collaboration and factors related to RTW for patients with chronic pain who have participated in IPRP. Methods Six focus groups, three pair and four individual interviews were conducted with a total of 28 stakeholder representatives from three societal and three health care stakeholders. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results The participants revealed that stakeholder collaboration and a tailored RTW rehabilitation plan were important strategies although they noted that these strategies were not working sufficiently efficient as presently implemented. The different stakeholders paradigms and organizational prerequisites were described as hindrances of such strategies and that the degree of tailoring depended on individual attitudes. Conclusions More knowledge transfer and flexibility, clearer responsibilities, and better coordination throughout the RTW rehabilitation process may increase the efficiency of stakeholder collaboration and support for patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Ltd , 2022. Vol. 44, no 26, p. 8388-8399
Keywords [en]
Chronic pain; stakeholder collaboration; return to work; rehabilitation; qualitative method
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-182630DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2018051ISI: 000745522600001PubMedID: 35060831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-182630DiVA, id: diva2:1634099
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2016-07414]; County Council of Ostergotland [LiO-582141]

Available from: 2022-02-01 Created: 2022-02-01 Last updated: 2023-04-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Work Interventions in the Context of Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Work Interventions in the Context of Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Chronic pain often leads to difficulties performing daily life and work activities. Sick-leave rates are high and work activities are valued both by people in general and patients with chronic pain. Therefore, it is important to find efficient ways to support patients to stay at work and return to work. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRP) aim to improve work participation for patients with chronic pain. However, results are diverging and it is unclear to what extent work interventions are part of IPRP. 

The overall aim with this thesis was to study work interventions in the context of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation and identify how it can be improved to better support patients with chronic pain in their return to work (RTW) rehabilitation process. 

Participants were included from IPRPs at both primary and specialist care level in Sweden. Data were collected from focus groups, pair- and individual interviews, questionnaires, and the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. 

This thesis highlight four important factors to consider when planning and performing work interventions in the context of IPRP: 

  • Knowledge and understanding of patients and stakeholders, 
  • A RTW rehabilitation plan being anchored between stakeholders 
  • Tailored solutions in relation to patient’s needs 
  • Collaboration, coordination, and continuity during the RTW rehabilitation process. 

Knowledge and understanding are important as base for solid, concrete, and tailored RTW plans, and for increasing self-efficacy and empowerment of the patients. The RTW plan is a common and important work intervention within IPRP in Sweden. RTW plans need to be more concrete, and include tailored strategies and interventions aimed at the needs of patients. Tailoring interventions also need to consider employment status. In addition, RTW rehabilitation plans should be tightly anchored with stakeholders and followed-up continually during the RTW rehabilitation process. The context of IPRP has potential that should be taken care of, for example when improving knowledge transfer and collaboration. SWEPPE, a new e-health intervention designed to support patients with chronic pain and their employers includes the four factors described above and should be acceptable for users after they complete an IPRP, however, further development of content and identification of patients that best benefit from SWEPPE are needed. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2023. p. 24
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1839
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-193258 (URN)10.3384/9789180750387 (DOI)978-91-8075-037-0 (ISBN)978-91-8075-038-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-06-02, Berzeliussalen, Campus US, Linköping, 09:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-04-26 Created: 2023-04-26 Last updated: 2023-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2041 kB)476 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2041 kBChecksum SHA-512
a3c29be8aaac7259f46533ec34d589eb9144b419af3a8f651848fe0c9d1083b55b9a3382b961d2d76af71bc9fdcfab87016853b4ab57fa326b4f939bd2a9e484
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Svanholm, FridaLiedberg, GunillaBjörk, Mathilda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svanholm, FridaLiedberg, GunillaBjörk, Mathilda
By organisation
Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesPain and Rehabilitation Center
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 477 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 226 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf