liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden
Umea Univ, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ, Sweden.
Uppsala Univ Hosp, Sweden.
Skane Univ Hosp Malmo, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Human Reproduction, ISSN 0268-1161, E-ISSN 1460-2350, Vol. 37, no 3, p. 510-521Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

STUDY QUESTION What characterizes the group of donor-conceived (DC) individuals who request information about their identity-release sperm donor in Sweden, and what are their experiences of disclosure, information receipt and donor contact? SUMMARY ANSWER Following three decades of identity-release donation in Sweden, few DC individuals have requested donor information with varying experiences of information receipt and donor contact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In 1985, Sweden was the first country worldwide to enact legislation that gave DC individuals the right to obtain identifying information about their donor. Since then, identity-release gamete donation has become available in many countries but there is limited knowledge about the individuals who request donor information. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A nation-wide cross-sectional survey study was performed at all seven University hospitals that provided donation treatment in Sweden during 1985-2002. During this period only donor insemination to heterosexual couples was permitted. Inclusion criteria were being 18 years of age or older, conceived with donor sperm and having requested information about the donor by December 2020. Recruitment was performed during 2016-2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 60 individuals had requested information about their donor. Of these, 53 were approached and 40 individuals, representing 34 families, accepted study participation (75% response rate). Participants completed a postal survey with the WHO-10 well-being index and study-specific questions about experiences of disclosure, motivations for requesting donor information, receipt of information, as well as intentions and experiences of donor contact. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare ratings of participants with early and late disclosure. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE Of similar to 900 DC individuals who had reached adult age, a total of 60 (approximate to 7%) had requested information about the donor. Most of the 40 study participants (78%) made their requests within 2 years after reaching 18 years of age, or following disclosure at later ages (up to 32 years). Several participants had adult DC siblings in the family who had not requested any donor information. All except five participants received identifying information about the donor from the clinic. However, some donors had died or lacked contact information. Among those participants who were able to contact their donor, 41% had done so at the time of the study, while a third of the participants were unsure about potential contact. Several had met the donor in person and a few were in regular contact. About half of the participants had been informed about their donor conception in adolescence or adulthood (age 12-32), and there were significant differences between participants based on age at disclosure. Compared to those with early disclosure, participants with late disclosure were significantly more likely to be dissatisfied with the timing of their disclosure (P = 0.021), to react with negative emotions (P < 0.001), and to subsequently contact the donor (P = 0.047). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The limited population available for inclusion resulted in a small sample size, despite a high response rate. In addition, mens lower participation rate must be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The small number of individuals requesting information about their identity-release sperm donor is surprising. While not all DC individuals appear to be interested in donor information, it is reasonable to assume that some are unaware of their donor conception and thus unable to make informed decisions regarding their genetic origins. During the coming years, young women and men in many countries will become eligible to access identifying information about their donor. In order to meet the needs of these individuals, and to support positive outcomes for all involved parties, it is essential that adequate protocols and resources are developed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2022. Vol. 37, no 3, p. 510-521
Keywords [en]
donor conception; donor insemination; disclosure; identity release; donor
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-183255DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab275ISI: 000756722300001PubMedID: 34918081OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-183255DiVA, id: diva2:1642240
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilEuropean Commission [2013-2712]

Available from: 2022-03-04 Created: 2022-03-04 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(432 kB)196 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 432 kBChecksum SHA-512
5c447b89a7df2998607d23bf9870ec8b7249af67707261ed6590a1a57af6d5ae31caa32865b0540aa1a4ddfb8320a2f0584b94907bfe54ca372e62120ca9df7a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Sydsjö, Gunilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sydsjö, Gunilla
By organisation
Division of Children's and Women's HealthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping
In the same journal
Human Reproduction
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 197 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 161 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf