liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A prospective dual-centre intra-individual controlled study for the treatment of burns comparing dermis graft with split-thickness skin auto-graft
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery.
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery.
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery.
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and Oncology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5903-2918
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 12, no 1, article id 21666Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To investigate if donor and recipient site morbidity (healing time and cosmesis) could be reduced by a novel, modified split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) technique using a dermal component in the STSG procedure (DG). The STSG technique has been used for 150 years in surgery with limited improvements. Its drawbacks are well known and relate to donor site morbidity and recipient site cosmetic shortcomings (especially mesh patterns, wound contracture, and scarring). The Dermal graft technique (DG) has emerged as an interesting alternative, which reduces donor site morbidity, increases graft yield, and has the potential to avoid the mesh procedure in the STSG procedure due to its elastic properties. A prospective, dual-centre, intra-individual controlled comparison study. Twenty-one patients received both an unmeshed dermis graft and a regular 1:1.5 meshed STSG. Aesthetic and scar assessments were done using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a Cutometer Dual MPA 580 on both donor and recipient sites. These were also examined histologically for remodelling and scar formation. Dermal graft donor sites and the STSG donor sites healed in 8 and 14 days, respectively (p < 0.005). Patient-reported POSAS showed better values for colour for all three measurements, i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months, and the observers rated both vascularity and pigmentation better on these occasions (p < 0.01). At the recipient site, (n = 21) the mesh patterns were avoided as the DG covered the donor site due to its elastic properties and rendered the meshing procedure unnecessary. Scar formation was seen at the dermal donor and recipient sites after 6 months as in the standard scar healing process. The dermis graft technique, besides potentially rendering a larger graft yield, reduced donor site morbidity, as it healed faster than the standard STSG. Due to its elastic properties, the DG procedure eliminated the meshing requirement (when compared to a 1:1.5 meshed STSG). This promising outcome presented for the DG technique needs to be further explored, especially regarding the elasticity of the dermal graft and its ability to reduce mesh patterns. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT05189743) 12/01/2022. © 2022, The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Portfolio , 2022. Vol. 12, no 1, article id 21666
Keywords [en]
burns, cicatrix, dermis, humans, prospective studies, skin transplantation
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-190855DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25346-4ISI: 001015461100020PubMedID: 36522434Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85144147270OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-190855DiVA, id: diva2:1723449
Note

Funding: Linkoping University; Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery Linkoping University Hospital; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping

Available from: 2023-01-03 Created: 2023-01-03 Last updated: 2025-02-11
In thesis
1. Autologous skin grafting for defects after burns and tumour surgery
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Autologous skin grafting for defects after burns and tumour surgery
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background

The skin is the largest organ in the human body and its vital functions are crucial for our survival. Skin grafting has gained increased popularity during the past two centuries and its practical utility has successively improved. The technique is crucial for permanent wound coverage including i.e. burns and for defects resulting after tumour surgery when other reconstructive regimens are not suitable. The evaluation of different treatments including skin grafting and secondary healing for skin defects, such as wounds that occur after burns and tumour surgery will be explored in this thesis.

Methods

The thesis includes two prospective studies, one retrospective and a methodological exploration. The patients were recruited in Linköping and Helsinki University Hospital. In the prospective randomised trials, functional and cosmetic outcome were evaluated with established validated tools, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the cutometer. Retrospectively, skin graft take rate and demographics were obtained from the local database and medical records. The methodological study was presented in a pilot set-up. Initially the apparatus prototype was refined and modified with technical improvements. Testing of the prototype was done ex vivo on excised tissue after abdominoplasties and subsequently on cadavers.

Results

The dermis graft (DG) method in burns of limited size presented a shorter healing duration at the donor site compared with wound coverage by using a conventional split-thickness skin graft (STSG), yet the healing duration was longer at the DG recipient site. The scar assessment was considered superior for the DG, especially at the donor site. Secondary healing of nasal defects after tumour surgery showed better POSAS values than full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) transplantation at follow-up. Our investigation showed that depth and size of the burn are the key factors affecting the success rate of skin grafts in cases of minor burns. The dermatome prototype facilitated the technical handling and produced corresponding grafts to the conventional STSG and DG. Histological analysis revealed a multilayer arrangement of all the skin layers with a clear epidermal architecture and deeper dermal characteristics. The median thickness of the superficial graft was slightly thinner than the deeper dermal graft.

Conclusion

The DG reduced donor site morbidity, while its elasticity and ability to expand allowed it to cover a larger wound area, leading to positive long-term outcomes at the recipient site. It did not necessitate the mesh procedure, although the strength of the previous statement is hampered due to the lack of specific expansion measures and ratios of the DG. However, longer healing time was seen at the DG recipient site.

Secondary healing intentions for nasal defects with limited size defects after tumour surgery may be beneficial for certain patients, especially in a cosmetic perspective with a better colour matching of the surrounding tissue. The longer healing duration in case of secondary healing is not a big issue and will not affect the long-term outcome. The depth and size of the burn are determinants affecting the success rate of skin grafts in minor burns, whereas the timing of the graft does not appear to affect the take rate. The dermatome prototype was able to simultaneously harvest two grafts in the same procedure, and moreover, it was possible to adjust the thickness of the grafts where caution should be taken to not harvest too deeply. The technique has the potential to reduce donor site morbidity and improve the aesthetic outcome at the recipient site, as the donor site is left non-exposed and the DG is not required to be meshed due to its enhanced elasticity. Despite the promising results indicating an advancement in skin grafting methodologies, the conclusion is hampered by the statement that the investigation was conducted on human cadavers. Additional research is essential to improve the prototype and broaden our understanding of the potential uses of dermal grafting in various clinical settings, where it could provide substantial benefits. Essential topics for future investigation include optimising the two-blade dermatome, examining the expansion scales and thickness variability of dermal grafts, conducting large clinical trials to confirm long-term advantages, and integrating dermal grafting with methods for tissue regeneration and reconstruction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2025. p. 75
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1954
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-211637 (URN)9789180758925 (ISBN)9789180758932 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-03-21, Hasselqvistsalen, Building 511, Campus US, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-02-11 Created: 2025-02-11 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2278 kB)205 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2278 kBChecksum SHA-512
2bffe4ba22f30310a1d0696ffff7531ba7847436417b3bad84c7a4bc87c58e09a2b2ca2bf47c4d20c56641ea9995d80762882fb0c256d390386b3a3533568d8e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Elmasry, MoustafaElserafy, Ahmed TaherSjöberg, FolkeGrigoriadi, Marina PerdikiAbdelrahman, IslamSteinvall, IngridKarlsson, MatildaOlofsson, Pia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dogan, SinanElmasry, MoustafaElserafy, Ahmed TaherSjöberg, FolkeGrigoriadi, Marina PerdikiAbdelrahman, IslamSteinvall, IngridKarlsson, MatildaOlofsson, Pia
By organisation
Division of Surgery, Orthopedics and OncologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Hand and Plastic SurgeryClinical pathologyDivision of Neurobiology
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 207 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 448 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf