liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relationship between self-reported listening and communication difficulties and executive function: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4035-712X
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research Division. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0446-0827
Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness (ManCAD), Division of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK..
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research Division. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1017-0025
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 13, no 11, article id e071225Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction

Listening and communication difficulties can limit people’s participation in activity and adversely affect their quality of life. Hearing, as well as listening and communication difficulties, can be measured either by using behavioural tests or self-report measures, and the outcomes are not always closely linked. The association between behaviourally measured and self-reported hearing is strong, whereas the association between behavioural and self-reported measures of listening and communication difficulties is much weaker, suggesting they assess different aspects of listening. While behavioural measures of listening and communication difficulties have been associated with poorer cognitive performance including executive functions, the same association has not always been shown for self-report measures. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to understand the relationship between executive function and self-reported listening and communication difficulties in adults with hearing loss, and where possible, potential covariates of age and pure-tone audiometric thresholds.

Methods and analysis

Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they report data from both a self-report measure of listening difficulties and a behavioural measure of executive function. Eight databases are to be searched: MEDLINE (via Ovid SP), EMBASE (via Ovid SP), PsycINFO (via Ovid SP), ASSIA (via ProQuest), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature or CINAHL (via EBSCO Host), Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index). The JBI critical appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias for included studies. Results will be synthesised primarily using a meta-analysis, and where sufficient quantitative data are not available, a narrative synthesis will be carried out to describe key results.

Ethics and dissemination

No ethical issues are foreseen. Data will be disseminated via academic publication and conference presentations. Findings may also be published in scientific newsletters and magazines.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2023. Vol. 13, no 11, article id e071225
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-199064DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071225ISI: 001102645200006PubMedID: 37940150OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-199064DiVA, id: diva2:1810783
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-06092
Note

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [CDF- 2018- 11- ST2- 016, PB- PG- 0816- 20044]; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre [NIHR 203310]; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre [NIHR 203308]; Swedish Research Council [2017- 06092]

Available from: 2023-11-09 Created: 2023-11-09 Last updated: 2024-05-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(310 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 310 kBChecksum SHA-512
08ccbf6d07f960be06b2d0b5699043fcb3673e7406db9c4fabab093f0132826235f9242a76f64ac4aec528aa868b4f6400554f66547b0bc26c6ab20ee2a7a449
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Danielsson, HenrikBatinović, LucijaHolmer, EmilIngo, Elisabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stacey, Jemaine EDanielsson, HenrikBatinović, LucijaHolmer, EmilIngo, ElisabethHenshaw, Helen
By organisation
Disability Research DivisionFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf