liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Barriers and enablers: How logistics companies could tackle the transition to electrified road freight transport
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Logistics & Quality Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6575-715x
2024 (English)In: CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, ISSN 2772-3909, Vol. 13, article id 100172Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Electrifying road freight transport can heavily reduce the sector's climate impact; however, there exist many uncertainties for making a large-scale transition, especially for logistics companies. In response, the purpose of this article is to identify and describe barriers to transition, but also strategies for how the barriers can be managed. To address the purpose, an interview study was carried out together with two complementary workshops to capture the views of relevant actors. Barriers to electrification are clustered into four separate areas: practical and technological barriers, financial barriers, institutional barriers, and social and cultural barriers. Low cost and high logistics performance are viewed as logistics companies' competitive advantages, but they are expected to be challenged when making the transition. The current structure of the transport chain also further complicates things: it is transaction-based and risks and benefits can occur in its different parts. This is an issue, since the actor that is forced to take risks is not always the actor that benefits the most. One way to manage this is for actors to form more long-term commitments through collaborations. Moreover, it can be advantageous to start electrifying subsystems that can be described as 'closed' and 'static', i.e. predictable and easy to control, such as transport between terminals. At the other end of the spectrum, subsystems that are 'open' and 'dynamic' are the ones that are most difficult to electrify.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER , 2024. Vol. 13, article id 100172
Keywords [en]
Electrification; Road freight transport; BEV; Logistics performance; Logistics service providers; Hauliers; Transport system
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-208268DOI: 10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100172ISI: 001320559600001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-208268DiVA, id: diva2:1904024
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Electromobility Centre [12027]

Available from: 2024-10-08 Created: 2024-10-08 Last updated: 2024-11-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Gillström, Henrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gillström, Henrik
By organisation
Logistics & Quality ManagementFaculty of Science & Engineering
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf