To investigate if donor and recipient site morbidity (healing time and cosmesis) could be reduced by a novel, modified split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) technique using a dermal component in the STSG procedure (DG). The STSG technique has been used for 150 years in surgery with limited improvements. Its drawbacks are well known and relate to donor site morbidity and recipient site cosmetic shortcomings (especially mesh patterns, wound contracture, and scarring). The Dermal graft technique (DG) has emerged as an interesting alternative, which reduces donor site morbidity, increases graft yield, and has the potential to avoid the mesh procedure in the STSG procedure due to its elastic properties. A prospective, dual-centre, intra-individual controlled comparison study. Twenty-one patients received both an unmeshed dermis graft and a regular 1:1.5 meshed STSG. Aesthetic and scar assessments were done using The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a Cutometer Dual MPA 580 on both donor and recipient sites. These were also examined histologically for remodelling and scar formation. Dermal graft donor sites and the STSG donor sites healed in 8 and 14 days, respectively (p < 0.005). Patient-reported POSAS showed better values for colour for all three measurements, i.e., 3, 6, and 12 months, and the observers rated both vascularity and pigmentation better on these occasions (p < 0.01). At the recipient site, (n = 21) the mesh patterns were avoided as the DG covered the donor site due to its elastic properties and rendered the meshing procedure unnecessary. Scar formation was seen at the dermal donor and recipient sites after 6 months as in the standard scar healing process. The dermis graft technique, besides potentially rendering a larger graft yield, reduced donor site morbidity, as it healed faster than the standard STSG. Due to its elastic properties, the DG procedure eliminated the meshing requirement (when compared to a 1:1.5 meshed STSG). This promising outcome presented for the DG technique needs to be further explored, especially regarding the elasticity of the dermal graft and its ability to reduce mesh patterns. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT05189743) 12/01/2022. © 2022, The Author(s).

This investigation delineates the evolution and prospective utilisation of an innovative two-blade dermatome, designed for the concurrent harvesting of a conventional split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and an additional dermal graft within the same surgical harvest. Historically, the extraction of dermal grafts has encountered substantial technical impediments, contributing to its limited acceptance and utilisation in clinical practice. The prototype dermatome, introduced in this technical note, offers a solution that could facilitate the more extensive adoption of dermal grafting techniques. The dermal segment of an STSG, obtained as a second graft, confers four notable advancements: First, employing solely the dermal component for grafting and repositioning the uppermost skin flap to the donor site, markedly diminishes donor site morbidity. Second, owing to its elasticity, the dermal graft reduces the need for meshing, thereby enhancing cosmetic outcomes. Third, utilising both the uppermost skin layer and a deeper dermal layer for the recipient site can reduce donor site areas. Fourth, the dermal segment of the graft can serve as a dermal matrix in reconstructive procedures, potentially reducing the need for an allogenic dermal matrix and obviating the subsequent STSG; the dermal graft may heal independently, eliminating the need for an additional conventional STSG. The findings of this study, predicated on the application of a first-generation two-blade dermatome on four cadavers, demonstrate the feasibility of extracting at least two distinct grafts with pre-determined thicknesses in a single, technically less challenging, surgical harvest procedure. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept research elucidates the feasibility of a two-blade dermatome, capable of simultaneously yielding at least one conventional STSG and one dermal graft, thereby simplifying skin graft harvesting. Although these preliminary investigations were conducted on human cadavers, the results hold promise for the development of two-blade dermatomes and represent a significant advancement in skin graft harvesting. Further research is imperative to refine the prototype and to broaden our comprehension of the potential applications of dermal grafting in various clinical scenarios.

Background: It has been known for decades that early excision of burns reduces morbidity and mortality. Early surgical excision and skin grafting has become the most important part of successful healing in burn management, especially in major burns. However, it is not entirely clear whether early excision and skin transplantation has the same advantages in smaller burns and there is no consensus on the timing of skin grafting in this group. The aim was to investigate the effect of timing and other factors for skin graft take rate among minor burns.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with thermal injury, a burn size smaller than 11 % total body surface area (TBSA), and who were treated with a skin graft operation. Take rate at the second dressing change after operation was used as main outcome, a cut-off of 95% take rate was for the multivariable logistic regression.

Results: A total of 195 patients were included, median (IQR) age was 42 (9–68) years, 65 % were male, and median (IQR) area of deep burns was 2 (1–4) % of the body surface area (BSA). Multivariable regression showed that smaller area of deep burns and scalds (compared with flame and contact burns) were associated with a take rate of ≥ 95 %. Age, timing of the skin graft transplantation, and plasma C-reactive protein showed no independent effect on take rate. The regression model was significant but weak (ROC AUC 0.71, 95 % CI 0.62–0.79).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the extent and depth of the burn are the most important factors for skin graft take rate among minor burns, while timing of the transplantation is not associated with take rate for the skin graft. The advantageous effect of scalds may be interpreted to mean that scalds in general are more superficial than flame and contact burns, a difference that may not be detected by the use of a Lund and Browder chart. The conclusion is, however, tempered by the retrospective study design and the relatively low discriminatory power in our study.