liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rosuvastatin is cost-effective compared with atorvastatin in reaching cholesterol goals
Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och vård, Internmedicin. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Medicincentrum, Endokrin- och magtarmmedicinska kliniken US.
2005 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Cardiology, ISSN 0167-5273, E-ISSN 1874-1754, Vol. 104, nr 3, s. 251-256Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels reduces the risk of coronary heart disease. The introduction of a highly efficacious new statin, rosuvastatin, may enable more patients to be treated to LDL-C goal within a fixed budget. Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg in lowering LDL-C and achieving guideline goals after 12 weeks of treatment. The LDL-C goals were those recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III and the Third Joint European Task Force. Methods: The analysis was performed on pooled data from three clinical trials. Efficacy was measured as the percent reduction in LDL-C and the proportion of patients who reached guideline LDL-C goals following the first 12 weeks of treatment, prior to dose titration. Costs comprised drug acquisition costs only. The cost-effectiveness measures were cost per 1% reduction in LDL-C and cost per patient treated to their LDL-C goal. Results: Treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg costs €1.85 per 1% reduction in LDL-C, compared with €2.37 per 1% reduction with atorvastatin 10 mg. The average costs per patient treated to the European LDL-C goals were €130.18 for rosuvastatin 10 mg and €242.44 for atorvastatin 10 mg. Treating to NCEP ATP III goals costs €115 per patient treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg vs. €163 per patient treated with atorvastatin 10 mg. Conclusions: Rosuvastatin has the same acquisition costs as and is more efficacious than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and treating patients to target LDL-C levels. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2005. Vol. 104, nr 3, s. 251-256
Emneord [en]
Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin, Cost-effectiveness, LDL-C goals
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-31065DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.09.015Lokal ID: 16785OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-31065DiVA, id: diva2:251888
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-10-09 Laget: 2009-10-09 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-13

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Olsson, Anders

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Olsson, Anders
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
International Journal of Cardiology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 96 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf