liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk communication in consultations about hormone therapy in the menopause: concordance in risk assessment and framing due to the context
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och vård, Klinisk farmakologi. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för molekylär och klinisk medicin, Obstetrik och gynekologi. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.
Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet. The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-2764-3095
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för molekylär och klinisk medicin, Obstetrik och gynekologi. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Climacteric, ISSN 1369-7137, E-ISSN 1473-0804, Vol. 9, nr 5, s. 347-354Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND:

It is important for the physician and the patient to have a mutual understanding of the possible consequences of different treatment alternatives in order to achieve a partnership in decision-making.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to explore to which degree first-time consultations for discussion of climacteric discomfort achieved shared understanding of the risks and benefits associated with hormone therapy in the menopausal transition.

METHODS:

Analysis of structure and content of transcribed consultations (n = 20), and follow-up interviews of the women (n = 19 pairs of consultations and interviews), from first-time visits for discussion of climacteric discomfort and/or HT with five physicians at three different outpatient clinics of gynecology in Sweden.

RESULTS:

Four distinctively different interpretations of risk, depending on whether or not benefits were discussed in the same context, emerged from the analysis. On average, five advantages (range 0-11) and two (0-3) disadvantages were mentioned during the consultations. In the interviews, the women expressed on average four advantages (0-7) and one disadvantage (0-3). There were major variations between advantages and disadvantages expressed in the consultation and the following interview.

CONCLUSION:

Even though the consultations scored high in patient involvement, the information in most consultations was not structured in a way that made it possible to achieve a shared or an informed decision-taking.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Informa Healthcare, 2006. Vol. 9, nr 5, s. 347-354
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-101519DOI: 10.1080/13697130600870220PubMedID: 17000583OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-101519DiVA, id: diva2:666442
Tillgänglig från: 2013-11-22 Skapad: 2013-11-22 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-06Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Hoffmann, MikaelHammar, MatsKjellgren, KarinLindh-Åstrand, LottaAhlner, Johan

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Hoffmann, MikaelHammar, MatsKjellgren, KarinLindh-Åstrand, LottaAhlner, Johan
Av organisationen
Klinisk farmakologiHälsouniversitetetObstetrik och gynekologi
I samma tidskrift
Climacteric
Medicin och hälsovetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 110 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf