liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Focus, goals and roles in e-service design – five ideal types of the design process
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Information Systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Stockholm Universitet, Sweden.
2014 (English)In: e-Service Journal, ISSN 1528-8226, E-ISSN 1528-8234, Vol. 9, no 2, p. 24-45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

New technology means new opportunities for both the private and public sectors. Serviceoriented solutions based on e-services are no exception. Such solutions can support efficient and flexible collaboration between actors, as well as enable opportunities for the design of new and highly innovative services. However, service-oriented solutions also mean a number of challenges. In order to successfully design e-services, a number of strategic choices have to be made by the service provider organization, such as deciding on the roles to be played by the provider and customers in the design process, and deciding which focus should govern the design. For example, should the e-service design focus on fit into the provider’s IT architecture; should the e-service design focus on fit into the provider’s internal processes; or should the e-service design focus on the interactions with the customers? In this paper, we present five different ideal types of e-service design that can support such choices. The five types differ in their views on the main goals of the e-service design; their views on the service providers’ and customers’ roles and responsibilities in the design process; and their views on the focus of the e-service design process. We also present the benefits and drawbacks of the different ideal types, and describe how real cases of e-service design can be categorized according to these types.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Indiana University Press, 2014. Vol. 9, no 2, p. 24-45
Keywords [en]
e-service, e-service design, ideal types, innovation, co-design
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-113662DOI: 10.2979/eservicej.9.2.24OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-113662DiVA, id: diva2:783869
Funder
VINNOVAAvailable from: 2015-01-27 Created: 2015-01-27 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to publication

Authority records

Goldkuhl, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Goldkuhl, Göran
By organisation
Information SystemsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
e-Service Journal
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 153 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf