liu.seSök publikationer i DiVA
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study evaluating a team initiative
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6434-4855
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet. Region Östergötland, Närsjukvården i västra Östergötland, Medicinska specialistkliniken.
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 15, nr 31Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

Non-communicable diseases are a leading cause of death and can largely be prevented by healthy lifestyles. Health care organizations are encouraged to integrate healthy lifestyle promotion in routine care. This study evaluates the impact of a team initiative on healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, cross-sectional design compared three intervention centres that had implemented lifestyle teams with three control centres that used a traditional model of care. Outcomes were defined using the RE-AIM framework: reach, the proportion of patients receiving lifestyle promotion; effectiveness, self-reported attitudes and competency among staff; adoption, proportion of staff reporting regular practice of lifestyle promotion; implementation, fidelity to the original lifestyle team protocol. Data collection methods included a patient questionnaire (n = 888), a staff questionnaire (n = 120) and structured interviews with all practice managers and, where applicable, team managers (n = 8). The chi square test and problem-driven content analysis was used to analyse the questionnaire and interview data, respectively.

Results:Reach: patients at control centres (48%, n = 211) received lifestyle promotion significantly more often compared with patients at intervention centres (41%, n = 169). Effectiveness: intervention staff was significantly more positive towards the effectiveness of lifestyle promotion, shared competency and how lifestyle promotion was prioritized at their centre. Adoption: 47% of staff at intervention centres and 58% at control centres reported that they asked patients about their lifestyle on a daily basis. Implementation: all intervention centres had implemented multi-professional teams and team managers and held regular meetings but struggled to implement in-house referral structures for lifestyle promotion, which was used consistently among staff.

Conclusions:Intervention centres did not show higher rates than control centres on reach of patients or adoption among staff at this stage. All intervention centres struggled to implement working referral structures for lifestyle promotion. Intervention centres were more positive on effectiveness outcomes, attitudes and competency among staff, however. Thus, lifestyle teams may facilitate lifestyle promotion practice in terms of increased responsiveness among staff, illustrated by positive attitudes and perceptions of shared competency. More research is needed on lifestyle promotion referral structures in primary care regarding their configuration and implementation.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
BioMed Central , 2015. Vol. 15, nr 31
Nyckelord [en]
Healthy lifestyle promotion; Primary care; Implementation fidelity; Coordination of care; RE-AIM framework
Nationell ämneskategori
Allmänmedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-114581DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0688-4ISI: 000348819200002PubMedID: 25608734OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-114581DiVA, id: diva2:791451
Anmärkning

Funding Agencies|Ostergotland County Council; Linkoping University

Tillgänglig från: 2015-02-27 Skapad: 2015-02-26 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-08-14

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(444 kB)311 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 444 kBChecksumma SHA-512
ad30720a0eb9c3b414239d52ed76b411ca05107852d1ea621eeb60d44340b2470efb0066555bb6a6b07768862004703cf46b384df846ab61d242b132776a9abc
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Andersson, KristinKrevers, BarbroBendtsen, Preben

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Andersson, KristinKrevers, BarbroBendtsen, Preben
Av organisationen
Avdelningen för samhällsmedicinHälsouniversitetetAvdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalysMedicinska specialistkliniken
I samma tidskrift
BMC Health Services Research
Allmänmedicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 311 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 789 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf