liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Spatiotemporal Variation in Distance Dependent Animal Movement Contacts: One Size Doesnt Fit All
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7856-2925
2016 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 11, no 10, e0164008- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The structure of contacts that mediate transmission has a pronounced effect on the outbreak dynamics of infectious disease and simulation models are powerful tools to inform policy decisions. Most simulation models of livestock disease spread rely to some degree on predictions of animal movement between holdings. Typically, movements are more common between nearby farms than between those located far away from each other. Here, we assessed spatiotemporal variation in such distance dependence of animal movement contacts from an epidemiological perspective. We evaluated and compared nine statistical models, applied to Swedish movement data from 2008. The models differed in at what level ( if at all), they accounted for regional and/or seasonal heterogeneities in the distance dependence of the contacts. Using a kernel approach to describe how probability of contacts between farms changes with distance, we developed a hierarchical Bayesian framework and estimated parameters by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. We evaluated models by three different approaches of model selection. First, we used Deviance Information Criterion to evaluate their performance relative to each other. Secondly, we estimated the log predictive posterior distribution, this was also used to evaluate their relative performance. Thirdly, we performed posterior predictive checks by simulating movements with each of the parameterized models and evaluated their ability to recapture relevant summary statistics. Independent of selection criteria, we found that accounting for regional heterogeneity improved model accuracy. We also found that accounting for seasonal heterogeneity was beneficial, in terms of model accuracy, according to two of three methods used for model selection. Our results have important implications for livestock disease spread models where movement is an important risk factor for between farm transmission. We argue that modelers should refrain from using methods to simulate animal movements that assume the same pattern across all regions and seasons without explicitly testing for spatiotemporal variation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE , 2016. Vol. 11, no 10, e0164008- p.
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-132667DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164008ISI: 000386204000024PubMedID: 27760155OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-132667DiVA: diva2:1048325
Note

Funding Agencies|Foreign Animal Disease Modeling Program, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security [HSHQDC-13-C-B0028]; European research area: animal health and welfare (ANIHWA) [ANR-13-ANWA-0007-03]

Available from: 2016-11-21 Created: 2016-11-18 Last updated: 2016-12-07

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3975 kB)0 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3975 kBChecksum SHA-512
341228239c647c250d60794c5fd76409e728b811ea626aecf2323c4756c67250cf4de761383dfd8e3d3d29870caf46029b023f94f92c9a5ae4956a6319936db6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brommesson, PeterWennergren, UnoLindström, Tom
By organisation
Theoretical BiologyFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 6 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link