liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Similar recent selection criteria associated with different behavioural effects in two dog breeds
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1262-4585
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2329-2635
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
2016 (English)In: Genes, Brain and Behavior, ISSN 1601-1848, E-ISSN 1601-183X, Vol. 15, no 8, 750-756 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Selection during the last decades has split some established dog breeds into morphologically and behaviourally divergent types. These breed splits are interesting models for behaviour genetics since selection has often been for few and well-defined behavioural traits. The aim of this study was to explore behavioural differences between selection lines in golden and Labrador retriever, in both of which a split between a common type (pet and conformation) and a field type (hunting) has occurred. We hypothesized that the behavioural profiles of the types would be similar in both breeds. Pedigree data and results from a standardized behavioural test from 902 goldens (698 common and 204 field) and 1672 Labradors (1023 and 649) were analysed. Principal component analysis revealed six behavioural components: curiosity, play interest, chase proneness, social curiosity, social greeting and threat display. Breed and type affected all components, but interestingly there was an interaction between breed and type for most components. For example, in Labradors the common type had higher curiosity than the field type (F1,1668 = 18.359; P < 0.001), while the opposite was found in goldens (F1,897 = 65.201; P < 0.001). Heritability estimates showed considerable genetic contributions to the behavioural variations in both breeds, but different heritabilities between the types within breeds was also found, suggesting different selection pressures. In conclusion, in spite of similar genetic origin and similar recent selection criteria, types behave differently in the breeds. This suggests that the genetic architecture related to behaviour differs between the breeds.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2016. Vol. 15, no 8, 750-756 p.
Keyword [en]
Behavioural genetics, behavioural test, dog behaviour, dogs, golden retriever, heritability, Labrador retriever, selection
National Category
Evolutionary Biology Zoology Behavioral Sciences Biology Genetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-132746DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12317PubMedID: 27520587OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-132746DiVA: diva2:1048906
Available from: 2016-11-22 Created: 2016-11-22 Last updated: 2016-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundman, Ann-SofieJohnsson, MartinWright, DominicJensen, Per
By organisation
BiologyFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Evolutionary BiologyZoologyBehavioral Sciences BiologyGenetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 5 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link