liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Physical vs. Virtual Agent Embodiment and Effects on Social Interaction
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (Cognition & Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-5391
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Cognition & Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6997-3917
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Cognition & Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3691-8756
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. (Cognition & Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6883-2450
2016 (English)In: Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 20–23, 2016, Proceedings / [ed] David Traum, William Swartout, Peter Khooshabeh, Stefan Kopp, Stefan Scherer, Anton Leuski, Cham: Springer, 2016, Vol. 10011, 412-415 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Previous work indicates that physical robots elicit more favorable social responses than virtual agents. These effects have been attributed to the physical embodiment. However, a recent meta-analysis by Li [1] suggests that the benefits of robots are due to physical presence rather than physical embodiment. To further explore the importance of presence we conducted a pilot study investigating the relationship between physical and social presence. The results suggest that social presence of an artificial agent is important for interaction with people, and that the extent to which it is perceived as socially present might be unaffected by whether it is physically or virtually present.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham: Springer, 2016. Vol. 10011, 412-415 p.
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743, E-ISSN 1611-3349 ; 10011
Keyword [en]
Embodiment, Physical presence, Social presence, Social influence, Social robots, Virtual agents
National Category
Interaction Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-132940DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_44ISI: 000390287300044Libris ID: 19855652ISBN: 9783319476643 (print)ISBN: 9783319476650 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-132940DiVA: diva2:1051747
Conference
Intelligent Virtual Agents: 16th International Conference, IVA 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 20--23, 2016
Available from: 2016-12-02 Created: 2016-12-02 Last updated: 2017-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2017-10-19 14:58
Available from 2017-10-19 14:58

Other links

Publisher's full textFind book at a Swedish library/Hitta boken på ett svenskt bibliotekFind book in another country/Hitta boken i ett annat land

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thellman, SamSilvervarg, AnnikaGulz, AgnetaZiemke, Tom
By organisation
Human-Centered systemsFaculty of Science & EngineeringFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Interaction Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 32 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf