liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Results of an inter and intra laboratory exercise on the assessment of complex autosomal DNA profiles.
Division of Biological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute.
Forensic Science Ireland.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering. Swedish National Forensic Centre, Linköping, Sweden.
Division of Biological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute.
2017 (English)In: Science & justice, ISSN 1355-0306, E-ISSN 1876-4452, Vol. 57, no 1, 21-27 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The interpretation of complex DNA profiles may differ between laboratories and reporting officers, which can lead to discrepancies in the final reports. In this study, we assessed the intra and inter laboratory variation in DNA mixture interpretation for three European ISO17025-accredited laboratories. To this aim, 26 reporting officers analyzed five sets of DNA profiles. Three main aspects were considered: 1) whether the mixed DNA profiles met the criteria for comparison to a reference profile, 2) the actual result of the comparison between references and DNA profiling data and 3) whether the weight of the DNA evidence could be assessed. Similarity in answers depended mostly on the complexity of the tasks. This study showed less variation within laboratories than between laboratories which could be the result of differences between internal laboratory guidelines and methods and tools available. Results show the profile types for which the three laboratories report differently, which informs indirectly on the complexity threshold the laboratories employ. Largest differences between laboratories were caused by the methods available to assess the weight of the DNA evidence. This exercise aids in training forensic scientists, refining laboratory guidelines and explaining differences between laboratories in court. Undertaking more collaborative exercises in future may stimulate dialog and consensus regarding interpretation. For training purposes, DNA profiles of the mixed stains and questioned references are made available.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 57, no 1, 21-27 p.
Keyword [en]
Autosomal STRs, Collaborative exercise, DNA mixture interpretation, Forensic science, Weight of evidence
National Category
Forensic Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-134249DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.10.001ISI: 000392899600004PubMedID: 28063581OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-134249DiVA: diva2:1069670
Note

Funding agencies: European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) Monopoly programme "DNActivity: International cooperation in activity level interpretation of forensic DNA evidence" [MP2013-T5]

Available from: 2017-01-30 Created: 2017-01-30 Last updated: 2017-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ansell, Ricky
By organisation
BiologyFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Science & justice
Forensic Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf