liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes.
School of Medicine and Health Institute for the Development of Education and Scholarship (Health IDEAS), Griffith University , Gold Coast , Australia..
School of Communication, University of Technology , Sydney , Australia..
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. (Medicinsk pedagogik)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5066-8728
College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba , Manitoba , Canada..
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Medical teacher, ISSN 0142-159X, E-ISSN 1466-187X, Vol. 36, no 4, 347-359 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2017. Vol. 36, no 4, 347-359 p.
National Category
Social Sciences Pedagogy Learning Pedagogical Work Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-135419DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270441ISI: 000399556000003PubMedID: 28024436OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-135419DiVA: diva2:1081487
Available from: 2017-03-14 Created: 2017-03-14 Last updated: 2017-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2017-12-26 14:35
Available from 2017-12-26 14:35

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abrandt Dahlgren, Madeleine
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Medical teacher
Social SciencesPedagogyLearningPedagogical WorkHealth Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 63 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf