liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 7. Occlusion in 5 year-olds according to the Huddart and Bodenham index.
Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Maxillofacial Unit.
Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, ISSN 2000-656X, E-ISSN 2000-6764, Vol. 51, no 1, 6 p.58-63 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aim:Good dentofacial development and good occlusion are main goals in the treatment of UCLP. The aim was to evaluate dental occlusion at age 5 years with the Huddart and Bodenham index after four different protocols of primary surgery for UCLP. Design:Three parallel randomised controlled trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and the UK. Methods:Three different surgical procedures for primary palatal repair (Arms B, C, and D) were tested against a common procedure (Arm A) in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Dental casts of 418 patients (272 boys, 146 girls), at the mean age of 5.1 years (range =4.7–6.9) were blindly assessed by 10 orthodontists with the original Huddart and Bodenham index. The main outcome measure was dental occlusion. Results:The inter- and intra-examiner reliability was good-to-excellent (0.61–0.94; 0.66–1.0, respectively). The mean total scores (+2 to −18) varied from −5.56 (Trial 2C) to −7.21 (Trial 3D). The mean anterior scores (+2 to −6) varied from −1.66 (Trial 2C) to −2.56 (Trial 3A). The mean posterior cleft-side scores (0 to −6) varied from −3.24 (Trial 3A) to −3.82 (Trial 3D) and the mean non-cleft-side scores (0 to −6) varied from −0.60 (Trial 2C) to −1.30 (Trial 3A); however, no significant differences were found within the trials. Conclusion:There was no statistical evidence of a difference in occlusion between the two surgical methods in each trial. Trial registration:ISRCTN29932826. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2017. Vol. 51, no 1, 6 p.58-63 p.
Keyword [en]
dental occlusion at 5 years, randomised controlled trials, Scandcleft, the original Huddart and Bodenham index, Unilateral cleft lip and palate
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-135499DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1265529ISI: 000395170100008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-135499DiVA: diva2:1082302
Available from: 2017-03-16 Created: 2017-03-16 Last updated: 2017-11-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marcusson, Agneta
By organisation
Division of Neuro and Inflammation ScienceFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesMaxillofacial Unit
In the same journal
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf