liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of different operatory setups on implant survival rate: a retrospective clinical study
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden, and Department of Oral; Maxillofacial Surgery, Head & Neck Oncology Center, University Hospital Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden.
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden; Department of Biomaterials Science, Institute for Surgical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
2009 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 11, no 4, 288-291 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Surgery performed under sterile operating conditions, as well as atraumatic surgery, has been stated to be among the most important requirements for successful osseointegration. However, there are few reports concerning the sterile surgical technique in association with implant placement, and the appropriate level of operatory setup is not fully known.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze implant survival rate using a simplified surgical operatory setup compared with the use of the original Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,285 consecutively treated patients were included in the study. Four thousand implants were placed during the period of 1985 to 2003. Group A (using the Brånemark System protocol) comprised of 654 patients and 2,414 implants. Group B (using a simplified operatory setup) comprised of 631 patients and 1,586 implants. Healing was evaluated after 6 months of clinical function. Failure was defined as the removal of implants because of nonosseointegration. Statistic analysis was performed using t-test for paired data. The level of significance was set at 5% for comparison of data.

RESULTS: No significant difference with regard to complications and implant survival rate was found in the study.

CONCLUSION: The result from the present study suggests that a simplified operatory setup does not affect the survival rate of oral implant treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2009. Vol. 11, no 4, 288-291 p.
National Category
Surgery Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-135757DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00123.xPubMedID: 19170719OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-135757DiVA: diva2:1083135
Available from: 2017-03-20 Created: 2017-03-20 Last updated: 2017-03-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cardemil, Carina
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
SurgeryDentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf