liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Use of evidence in clinical guidelines and everyday practice for mechanical ventilation in Swedish intensive care units.
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, ISSN 1545-102X, E-ISSN 1741-6787, Vol. 10, no 4, 198-207 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND AIM: One way to support evidence-based decisions in health care is by clinical guidelines, in particular, in highly specialized care such as intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to explore the development and dissemination of guidelines regarding mechanical ventilation (MV) in Swedish ICUs, and the use of evidence on MV in guidelines and everyday practice.

METHODS: Inviting all general ICUs in Sweden (N = 65), a national survey was performed on occurrence of MV guidelines, and a review of submitted ICU guidelines by four evidence items from the AGREE instrument. In addition, ICU head nurses and senior physicians were interviewed using semistructured and open-ended questions to explore development and dissemination of MV guidelines, staff adherence or nonadherence to guidelines, and everyday practice of MV management bedside.

FINDINGS: Fifty-five ICUs (85%) participated in the study; 51 ICUs submitted a total of 245 guidelines, including recommendations for medical or nursing MV actions. None of the documents included how evidence had been sought or assessed, while 22% included a list of references (n = 54). No guidelines included patients' experiences of MV. According to the managers, the guidelines were most often compiled by a multiprofessional team sharing the information through the ICU's website. The guidelines were mainly used as a basis for MV management bedside, but variation occurred as a result of personal preferences, lack of awareness, and adjustment to patients' needs.

CONCLUSIONS: Local MV guidelines seem to constitute a basis for healthcare practice in Swedish ICUs, even though the evidence proposed was limited with respect to how it was attained and lacked patient perspectives. In addition, the strategies used for dissemination were limited, suggesting that further initiatives are needed to support knowledge translation in advanced healthcare environments such as ICUs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 10, no 4, 198-207 p.
Keyword [en]
evidence-based practice, guidelines, intensive care, knowledge translation, mechanical ventilation, patient experiences
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136134DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12008PubMedID: 23796046OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-136134DiVA: diva2:1085311
Available from: 2017-03-28 Created: 2017-03-28 Last updated: 2017-03-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann Catrine
In the same journal
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf