liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds - consonant proficiency and errors
University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
Sahlgrens University Hospital, Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Speech language pathology, Audiology and Otorhinolaryngology. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, ISSN 2000-656X, E-ISSN 2000-6764, Vol. 51, no 1, 38-51 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aim: Normal articulation before school start is a main objective in cleft palate treatment. The aim was to investigate if differences exist in consonant proficiency at age 5 years between children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) randomised to different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair. A secondary aim was to estimate burden of care in terms of received additional secondary surgeries and speech therapy. Design: Three parallel group, randomised clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Methods: Three different surgical protocols for primary palatal repair were tested against a common procedure in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio- and video-recordings of 391 children (136 girls and 255 boys) were available and transcribed phonetically. The main outcome measure was Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) from blinded assessments. Results: In Trial 1, arm A showed statistically significant higher PCC scores (82%) than arm B (78%) (p=.045). No significant differences were found between prevalences in Trial 2, A: 79%, C: 82%; or Trial 3, A: 80%, D: 85%. Across all trials, girls achieved better PCC scores, excluding s-errors, than boys (91.0% and 87.5%, respectively) (p=.01). Conclusions: PCC scores were higher in arm A than B in Trial 1, whereas no differences were found between arms in Trials 2 or 3. The burden of care in terms of secondary pharyngeal surgeries, number of fistulae, and speech therapy visits differed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2017. Vol. 51, no 1, 38-51 p.
Keyword [en]
Primary palatal repair; unilateral cleft lip and palate; consonant proficiency; cleft speech characteristics; randomised clinical trial
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136210DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1254647ISI: 000395170100006PubMedID: 28218556OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-136210DiVA: diva2:1086560
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2011-1443]

Available from: 2017-04-03 Created: 2017-04-03 Last updated: 2017-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundeborg, IngerHölttä, Elina
By organisation
Division of Speech language pathology, Audiology and OtorhinolaryngologyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf