liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 2. Surgical results
Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
University of Copenhagen Hospital, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen Hospital, Denmark.
Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, ISSN 2000-656X, E-ISSN 2000-6764, Vol. 51, no 1, 14-20 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Longstanding uncertainty surrounds the selection of surgical protocols for unilateral cleft lip and palate, and randomised trials have only rarely been performed. The Scandcleft Project consists of three trials commenced in 1997 involving ten centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Three groups of centres tested a newly-defined common technique for palatal repair (Arm A) against their local protocols (Arms B, C, D). Arm A was familiar to most of the surgeons in Trial 1, but not to the surgeons in the other Trials. Aim: To evaluate surgical events and complications of the 448 (293 boys, 155 girls) patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) enrolled in the three trials. Method: The three trials were carried out in parallel in adherence with a fully developed, ethically approved protocol. Operative time, bleeding, complications, and major dehiscence during and after both primary surgeries were recorded by the surgeon. Rates of fistula and surgery for velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) were assessed until the youngest patient of the study had reached the age of 9 years. Pearson Chi-square statistical analysis was used to compare the outcomes. Results: No significant differences in bleeding, infection, anaesthetic complications or length of hospital stay between the different arms were found for Trial 1. However, in Trials 2 and 3 there were more airway problems in Arm A than with the traditional local protocols (Arms C or D). In Trial 3 fistula and VPI surgery rates were also higher in Arm A. Conclusions: The results do not provide statistical evidence that any technique is better than others, but indicate that surgery was more problematic for surgeons who were still gaining experience with an unfamiliar surgical protocol.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2017. Vol. 51, no 1, 14-20 p.
Keyword [en]
Cleft lip and palate; surgical technique; palatal fistula; velopharyngeoplasty rate
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136207DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1254646ISI: 000395170100003PubMedID: 28218552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-136207DiVA: diva2:1086583
Available from: 2017-04-03 Created: 2017-04-03 Last updated: 2017-04-03

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berggren, Anders
By organisation
Department of Hand and Plastic SurgeryDivision of Clinical SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf