liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability and concurrent validity of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Department of Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: World Journal of Orthopedics, ISSN 2218-5836, E-ISSN 2218-5836, Vol. 8, no 1, 68-76 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: To investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of the Baseline(®) Body Level/Scoliosis meter for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis postural assessment in three anatomical planes.

METHODS: This is an observational reliability and concurrent validity study of adolescent referrals to the Orthopaedic department for scoliosis screening at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between March-May 2012. A total of 31 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (13.6 ± 0.6 years old) of mild-moderate curvatures (25° ± 12°) were consecutively recruited. Measurement of cervical, thoracic and lumbar curvatures, pelvic and shoulder tilt, and axial thoracic rotation (ATR) were performed by two trained physiotherapists in one day. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the inter-examiner reliability (ICC2,1) and the intra-rater reliability (ICC3,3) of the Baseline(®) Body Level/Scoliosis meter. Spearman's correlation analyses were used to estimate concurrent validity between the Baseline(®) Body Level/Scoliosis meter and Gold Standard Cobb angles from radiographs and the Orthopaedic Systems Inc. Scoliometer.

RESULTS: There was excellent reliability between examiners for thoracic kyphosis (ICC2,1 = 0.94), ATR (ICC2,1 = 0.92) and lumbar lordosis (ICC2,1 = 0.79). There was adequate reliability between examiners for cervical lordosis (ICC2,1 = 0.51), however poor reliability for pelvic and shoulder tilt. Both devices were reproducible in the measurement of ATR when repeated by one examiner (ICC3,3 0.98-1.00). The device had a good correlation with the Scoliometer (rho = 0.78). When compared with Cobb angle from radiographs, there was a moderate correlation for ATR (rho = 0.627).

CONCLUSION: The Baseline(®) Body Level/Scoliosis meter provides reliable transverse and sagittal cervical, thoracic and lumbar measurements and valid transverse plan measurements of mild-moderate scoliosis deformity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited , 2017. Vol. 8, no 1, 68-76 p.
Keyword [en]
Assessment, Posture, Reliability, Scoliosis, Validity
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136687DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i1.68PubMedID: 28144582Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85010505519OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-136687DiVA: diva2:1095094
Available from: 2017-05-12 Created: 2017-05-12 Last updated: 2017-06-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(901 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 901 kBChecksum SHA-512
9f7428ebe8b03e8c3e3e079542d74aff3e16221d82029e21c43ff552def62233fc04428ef1cf70bee138f83d2bad20ba8a593ca3e6e42a4df6b32365b4eb9687
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abbott, Allan
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
World Journal of Orthopedics
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 82 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf