liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Using of Group-Modeling in Predesign Phase of New Healthcare Environments: Stakeholders Experiences.
Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Department of Nursing, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
School of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Department of Nursing, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, ISSN 1937-5867, E-ISSN 2167-5112, Vol. 9, no 2, 69-81 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Current research shows a relationship between healthcare architecture and patient-related outcomes. The planning and designing of new healthcare environments is a complex process. The needs of the various end users of the environment must be considered, including the patients, the patients' significant others, and the staff. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare professionals participating in group modeling utilizing system dynamics in the predesign phase of new healthcare environments. We engaged healthcare professionals in a series of workshops using system dynamics to discuss the planning of healthcare environments in the beginning of a construction and then interviewed them about their experience.

METHODS: An explorative and qualitative design was used to describe participants' experiences of participating in the group-modeling projects. Participants (N = 20) were recruited from a larger intervention study using group modeling and system dynamics in planning and designing projects. The interviews were analyzed by qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: Two themes were formed, representing the experiences in the group-modeling process: "Participation in the group modeling generated knowledge and was empowering" and "Participation in the group modeling differed from what was expected and required the dedication of time and skills."

CONCLUSIONS: The method can support participants in design teams to focus more on their healthcare organization, their care activities, and their aims rather than focusing on detailed layout solutions. This clarification is important when decisions about the design are discussed and prepared and will most likely lead to greater readiness for future building process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 9, no 2, 69-81 p.
Keyword [en]
codesign, design development, design methodology, environments of care, group modeling, participatory design, quality improvements, system thinking
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-137427DOI: 10.1177/1937586715599650PubMedID: 26297717OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-137427DiVA: diva2:1095591
Available from: 2017-05-15 Created: 2017-05-15 Last updated: 2017-05-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann Catrine
In the same journal
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf