liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration
University of Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Australia.
St George Hospital, England.
Johns Hopkins University, MD USA.
McMaster University, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Circulation, ISSN 0009-7322, E-ISSN 1524-4539, Vol. 135, no 19, 1851-+ p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Approximately 10% of ischemic strokes are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) first diagnosed at the time of stroke. Detecting asymptomatic AF would provide an opportunity to prevent these strokes by instituting appropriate anticoagulation. The AF-SCREEN international collaboration was formed in September 2015 to promote discussion and research about AF screening as a strategy to reduce stroke and death and to provide advocacy for implementation of country-specific AF screening programs. During 2016, 60 expert members of AF-SCREEN, including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, health economists, and patient advocates, were invited to prepare sections of a draft document. In August 2016, 51 members met in Rome to discuss the draft document and consider the key points arising from it using a Delphi process. These key points emphasize that screen-detected AF found at a single timepoint or by intermittent ECG recordings over 2 weeks is not a benign condition and, with additional stroke factors, carries sufficient risk of stroke to justify consideration of anticoagulation. With regard to the methods of mass screening, handheld ECG devices have the advantage of providing a verifiable ECG trace that guidelines require for AF diagnosis and would therefore be preferred as screening tools. Certain patient groups, such as those with recent embolic stroke of uncertain source (ESUS), require more intensive monitoring for AF. Settings for screening include various venues in both the community and the clinic, but they must be linked to a pathway for appropriate diagnosis and management for screening to be effective. It is recognized that health resources vary widely between countries and health systems, so the setting for AF screening should be both country-and health system-specific. Based on current knowledge, this white paper provides a strong case for AF screening now while recognizing that large randomized outcomes studies would be helpful to strengthen the evidence base.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS , 2017. Vol. 135, no 19, 1851-+ p.
Keyword [en]
atrial fibrillation; screening; stroke
National Category
Family Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-137834DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026693ISI: 000400757900017PubMedID: 28483832OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-137834DiVA: diva2:1105207
Note

Funding Agencies|Bayer HealthCare; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer; Daiichi Sankyo; Medtronic; C-SPIN (Canadian Stroke Prevention Intervention Network); Zenicor; iRhythm

Available from: 2017-06-02 Created: 2017-06-02 Last updated: 2017-06-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Levin, Lars-Åke
By organisation
Division of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Circulation
Family Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 509 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf