liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Negotiating deontic rights in second position: Young adult daughters' imperatively formatted responses to mothers' offers in Estonian
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2175-8710
2017 (English)In: Imperative turns at talk: The design of directives in action / [ed] M.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, E. Couper-Kuhlen, Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017, 271-295 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This study looks at offer sequences in Estonian with an analytical focus on answers in the imperative form. “Telling someone to do something” has traditionally been considered an initiating action, typically an order. In this study, however, Estonian speakers are shown to produce “orders” in second position, i.e., in response to an initiating action. These imperative responses are grammatically fitted to first actions in at least two ways. First, they reuse the verbs in the first actions, thus constituting one type of verb repeat response that is common in Estonian conversation. Second, they are grammatically restricted to positions after turns formatted in 1st person, termed my-side offers in this study. With the adjacency pair my-side offer – imperative response participants are shown to navigate the landscape of interpersonal deontics. It is a crucial feature of my-side offers that the speaker defines the future from her own perspective, formulating what she herself will do, albeit with clear consequences for, and obligations by, the recipient. The originator of the offer thus claims deontic rights over the future course of activities that concern both parties, and displays a strong expectation of acceptance by the other. Imperative responses, however, challenge these rights. Instead of merely accepting the offer, they redefine the current speaker as the deontic authority. The analysis is based on phone calls between mothers and young adult daughters – a relationship where entitlement to services, as well as respective deontic rights, can be an issue. It is overwhelmingly mothers who produce offers in these calls, and daughters who answer them in the imperative form. The paper argues that the daughters thereby reclaim agency and rights to independently decide upon their future in the ongoing process of becoming a responsible adult. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. 271-295 p.
Series
Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ISSN 1879-3983 ; 30
Keyword [en]
Imperative, echo answers, responses to offers, offer sequence, deontics, agency, repeating, grammar in interaction, Estonian, mother-daughter relationship
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-138015ISBN: 9789027226402 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-138015DiVA: diva2:1105879
Available from: 2017-06-05 Created: 2017-06-05 Last updated: 2017-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Keevallik, Leelo
By organisation
Language and CultureFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 1 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf