liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Integrating Requirements Engineering for Different Domains in System Development: Lessons Learnt from Industrial SME Cases
University of Bremen, BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH, Germany.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.
University of Bremen, Faculty of Production Engineering, Germany.
2017 (English)In: Procedia CIRP: 9th CIRP IPSS Conference: Circular Perspectives on PSS / [ed] Tim C. McAloone, Daniela C.A. Pigosso, Niels Henrik Mortensen and Yoshiki Shimomura, Elsevier, 2017, Vol. 64, 351-356 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

There is a trending transition for companies from offering products to solutions in order to fulfill better customer needs and to reduce environmental impact by e.g. dematerialization. This solution-based development has an associated integration of intelligent devices that contributes to increasing system complexity. The ability of systems engineering processes, methods and tools to cope with these developments is a critical factor for manufacturing companies today. Still, in many cases it is hard to find adequately trained people and sufficiently integrated development tools for complex solutions, especially in the case of small and medium sized enterprises. Often, the tangible (hardware) part of the solution is primarily developed and the intangible parts (software and services) are added on top. However, key for a successful development is to adapt and integrate all parts according to the requirements set for the solution. Thus, it is essential how requirements are worked with during systems engineering and how they influence the development of the tangible and intangible parts of the solution. The objective of this paper is to study the approach of different industrial use cases for requirements engineering in system development. The aim is to identify how practices from domains like mechanical engineering, software or service engineering can be adapted for an integrated requirements engineering for complex systems, like product-service systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2017. Vol. 64, 351-356 p.
Series
Procedia CIRP, ISSN 2212-8271
Keyword [en]
Systems Engineering; Requirements Engineering; Product-Service Systems; Industrial Case Study
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-138351DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.013ISI: 000414528200060OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-138351DiVA: diva2:1109166
Conference
9th CIRP IPSS Conference: Circular Perspectives on PSS, June 19-21, 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark
Note

Funding agencies:This work has been funded by the European Commission through the project PSYMBIOSYS: Product-Service sYMBIOtic SYStems (No. 636804) and by Mistra (The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research) through the Mistra REES (Resource Efficient and Effective Solutions) program. The authors wish to acknowledge the funding bodies and all the project partners for their contribution.

Available from: 2017-06-13 Created: 2017-06-13 Last updated: 2017-11-20
In thesis
1. How requirements development could support design of effective and resource-efficient offerings
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How requirements development could support design of effective and resource-efficient offerings
2017 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

What a company offers its customers has to fulfil several different needs, desires, constraints, which can originate from multiple different sources that affect the offering throughout its life cycle. All these criteria have to come together and be translated into statements that can support the designer’s understanding of the offering’s purpose. This translation is done through a requirements development process to provide a controlled process to define statements that describe what the offering is supposed to fulfil.

This research provides insights on key challenges and success factors in requirements development to support the design of effective and resource-efficient offerings. Namely, it identifies crucial sources and aspects to be considered, and a requirements development process demonstrating how to overcome identified challenges. By getting the requirements right from the beginning, sub-optimisation and unnecessary time and risks can be avoided. The consideration of accurate sources and aspects is considered to be one of the most important factors for the successful design of offerings. It is also in the earliest phases of design, that is to say requirements development, where one has the greatest possibility to affect the environmental impact of the offering. What is missing, however, is sufficient and appropriate support in industry on how to do so.

The gap between the three areas of effectiveness and resource efficiency, design of integrated offerings, and requirements development has been investigated. Results are based on findings in the literature and in industry, identified primarily by qualitative studies. In the research, 15 different companies have been included through a number of interviews and discussions.

Key sources and aspects to consider in the requirements development process are identified along with challenges, and success factors that can be utilised to overcome the identified challenges. This research’s final results include an adapted requirements development process that considers the earlier-mentioned sources and aspect, challenges, and success factors. Such a requirements development process should support the design of effective and resource-efficient offerings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2017. 77 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Thesis, ISSN 0280-7971 ; 1789
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-143011 (URN)10.3384/lic.diva-143011 (DOI)9789176854327 (ISBN)
Presentation
2017-12-07, ACAS, A-huset, Campus Valla, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

The series name given in the fulltext: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Licentiate Thesis is incorrect. The correct series name is: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Thesis

Available from: 2017-11-15 Created: 2017-11-15 Last updated: 2017-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(141 kB)23 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 141 kBChecksum SHA-512
0a192c9a97aac6847959bbf47987d8aa7c12f5b6613ae0429447109b0b3de9dc99d91cb0ab979b3444dbd74ad01990e31b181f5da5b776e08f42026f1c4222a3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Sara
By organisation
Environmental Technology and ManagementFaculty of Science & Engineering
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 23 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf