liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Variables Related to Communication About Prognosis Between Nurses and Patients at Heart Failure Clinics in Sweden and the Netherlands.
Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Division of Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Jönköping University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Division of Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in East Östergötland, Center of Palliative Care.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9606-3238
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, ISSN 0889-4655, E-ISSN 1550-5049Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND:

In contrast to recommendations in recent guidelines, prognosis is not optimally discussed with patients with heart failure (HF). Reasons for not doing so can be related to both patient and provider characteristics.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the study was to explore which patient- and nurse-related variables influence discussing prognosis with patients at an HF clinic.

METHOD:

Data from a previous survey on attitudes and clinical practice of HF nurses on discussing prognosis that was conducted in Sweden and the Netherlands were combined with data from a registration on topics that nurses discussed with their patients during a prespecified week at the HF clinic. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess which variables are related to discussing prognosis.

RESULTS:

A total of 275 HF nurses (mean age, 49 years) and data of 1633 patients with HF (mean age, 71 years) were included in the study. Prognosis was discussed with 42% of all patients during the visit at the HF clinic. Patients with whom prognosis was discussed were more often in New York Heart Association classes III to IV (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.26). Nurses discussing prognosis reported more knowledge on the topic (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.36-2.16) and discussed more topics with the patient (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.32). Dutch HF nurses were more likely to discuss prognosis compared with their Swedish colleagues (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.43-2.33).

CONCLUSIONS:

Discussing prognosis with patients with HF by nurses at the HF clinic is related to the characteristics of patients and HF nurses. Future interventions to improve communications about prognosis therefore should have a broad approach.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017.
Keyword [en]
end-of-life care, heart failure, nursing, palliative care, prognosis
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-138679DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000416OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-138679DiVA: diva2:1113034
Note

Funding agencies:This study was funded by the Heart and Lung Foundation (number20110417) and King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria"s Foundationof the Freemasons.

Available from: 2017-06-21 Created: 2017-06-21 Last updated: 2017-07-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van der Wal, MartjeHjelmfors, LisaFriedrichsen, MariaStrömberg, AnnaJaarsma, Tiny
By organisation
Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDivision of Nursing ScienceCenter of Palliative CareDivision of Nursing ScienceDepartment of Cardiology in Linköping
In the same journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 307 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf