liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Editorial Material: Planning and establishment principles for constructed wetlands and riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments in ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, vol 103, issue , pp 296-300
University of Tartu, Estonia; National Research Institute Science and Technology Environm and Agriculture Irstea, France.
National Research Institute Science and Technology Environm and Agriculture Irstea, France.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Science & Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0722-6083
University of Utrecht, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Ecological Engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology, ISSN 0925-8574, E-ISSN 1872-6992, Vol. 103, p. 296-300Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

In a great number of scientific articles on water quality improvement using constructed wetlands (CW) and riparian buffers zones (RBZ) at catchment scale, contradictory results are found. In most cases this is due to underestimating or even ignoring the role of the hydrological factor for water quality improvement. It has often resulted in biased estimates of buffering systems efficiency at catchment scale and, consequently, has caused planning and establishment failures, mistakes and inconsistencies in legislative acts and finally, it has influenced stakeholders willingness to support these eco-technological measures. In this paper we present a short but critical overview of the potential of CWs and RBZs in water quality improvement at catchment scale and highlight the most important aspects to be considered when planning, establishing and managing these systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV , 2017. Vol. 103, p. 296-300
Keywords [en]
Enhanced systems; Hydrological connectedness; Hydraulic retention time; Loading rate; Nitrate; Pesticides; Phosphorus
National Category
Water Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-139192DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.006ISI: 000402830800002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-139192DiVA, id: diva2:1120179
Note

Funding Agencies|AESN; LifeARTWet [ENV/F/000133]; PIREN Seine; Estonian Research Council [IUT2-16]; EU through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence ENVIRON); EU through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence EcolChange)

Available from: 2017-07-05 Created: 2017-07-05 Last updated: 2018-03-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tonderski, Karin
By organisation
BiologyFaculty of Science & Engineering
In the same journal
Ecological Engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology
Water Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 295 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf